Posted by Randy Barnett:
Bloggers v. Journalists:  

   In response to my [1]Joy of Blogging post a reader writes:

     I have seen this sentiment posted on many blogs, and I think it
     displays a lack of knowledge about the newspaper industry. As
     someone who has done my time in the trenches of a small town daily
     newspaper, I can assure you that readers do not hesitate to write,
     call, email and stop by offices if they see an error. Misspell the
     name of the winner of the local Girl Scout cookie sale and you can
     be sure that there will be multiple phone calls in your voicemail
     within minutes of the issue hitting the streets.
     As to the timeliness of corrections -- that is something in the
     innate nature of newspapers, true. But I fail to see why that
     negates the entire value of a newspaper. Television news can
     correct instantly, as can radio news. Each medium has its own
     strengths and weaknesses.

   I think this comment underscores the point I was making, the second
   half of which is the fact that journalists have no way to immediately
   correct their errors even when they learn of their mistakes. Advantage
   blogs. And the cost of contacting a journalist to report an error is
   MUCH higher than emailing a blogger, coupled with a much diminished
   incentive to incur the cost since corrections are so unlikely. I don't
   doubt that readers do it as this person reports, but I am quite
   certain that many readers do "hesitate to write" to report an error.
   Heck, I just had a profile in the Newton Tab in which my son's name
   was completely wrong and I did not bother to let the reporter know. (I
   cannot link to the story because it is [2]now "archived" and I do not
   see how to access the archive. Another advantage blogs.) Given that no
   correction would be forthcoming, it just didn't matter, and why make
   the very nice reporter feel bad about his mistake? Even newspaper
   websites are not updated the way blogs are. So here too I think that
   blogs are at a comparative advantage to traditional journalists. And
   far from "negat[ing] the entire value of a newspaper," I pointed out
   that traditional reporters remain the primary source of information
   that feeds the blogs.

References

   1. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_02_07.shtml#1108401233
   2. http://www2.townonline.com/newton/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=149898

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to