Posted by Orin Kerr:
Things Better Left Unsaid:

   As [1]Eugene noted below, a lawyer arguing at the Supreme Court this
   morning finished his argument by saying "I want to leave you with just
   four words . . . ", at which time his time expired. The Court is very
   strict about oral argument time; when your time expires, you really
   have to stop. So the lawyer never got to tell the Court what the four
   words were. [2]SCOTUSblog reports that the lawyer later answered the
   question on everyone's mind -- what are the four words? -- when he
   told reporters what the four words were "Federalism, boundaries,
   discretion, and precedent." I don't know what book on closing
   arguments the lawyer got this trick from, but it's hard to think of a
   worse ending for a Supreme Court argument than that. (Might work for a
   jury trial, but Supreme Court Justices are not jurors.) As Tom
   Goldstein puts it, "Ok, so maybe it wasn't such a loss that he didn't
   get that last line out."

References

   1. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_02_20-2005_02_26.shtml#1109099039
   2. 
http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2005/02/the_mystery_fou.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to