Posted by David Bernstein:
American Spectator on Asbestos Litigation:

   Good piece in the March American Spectator on the asbestos mess. It
   doesn't seem to be online. I am quoted as follows:

   "Money attracts lawyers like bees to honey," said David Bernstein, a
   George Mason University law professor who has written extensively on
   asbestos litigation. "In the absence of courts enforcing medical
   standards, the only risk to tort lawyers is what they pay for the
   photocopies. They just open up the file in their word processor and
   type in new names."

   "Just to respond to a case costs a company hundreds of dollars,"
   Bernstein continued. "If at all plausible, most companies would save
   money just paying even baseless claims off at $500 or even $2,000
   apiece. And this breeds more of the same. For a single person filing a
   nuisance suit isn't worth it. It's too expensive. But you file 800 at
   once? 8,000? As long as the courts require so little actual evidence,
   the problem of asbestos litigation will continue to get worse."

   "One of the main problems with asbestos litigation is that in the
   early 80s, when there were a lot of plaintiffs who were quite
   obviously injured, many states adopted special rules for asbestos
   litigation that were much more liberal with regard to analysis and
   causation," Bernstein said. "Now most asbestos claims are much less
   valid, but the liberal rules still apply. That's why you see companies
   with a tenuous connection to asbestos being sued and plaintiffs not
   deserving of checks receiving a lot of money."

   George Mason University law professor David Bernstein said a real
   amelioration of the problem might not come until the visibility of the
   issue has been raised substantially. "When the publicity gets intense
   enough, courts might examine these claims more rigorously and be more
   willing to throw out the frivolous claims of unimpaired plaintiffs,"
   Bernstein said. "Asbestos litigation might be less a question of
   judicial process than public opinion."

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to