Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Another Reason To Be Skeptical of International Influence in U.S. 
Constitutional Law:

   Consider this [1]account in the Times of London:

     Supermodels have fallen foul of France�s blasphemy laws with an
     advertising campaign that parodies Leonardo da Vinci�s painting,
     The Last Supper.

     A judge ordered the advertising posters to be removed yesterday
     from billboards across France within three days or risk a daily
     fine of �100,000 (£70,000)....

     The campaign, which was also banned by magistrates in Milan in
     February, was described as offensive to Catholics by the presiding
     judge, Jean-Claude Magendie.

     Thierry Massis, the [plaintiff] bishops� lawyer, said: �When you
     attack sacred things, you create a moral violence that is dangerous
     for our children. Tomorrow we�ll have Christ selling socks....

     In recent years bishops have taken legal action over a poster for
     the film Amen, which showed a Christian cross that merged into Nazi
     swastikas, and over an advertising campaign for Volkswagen, which
     showed Jesus saying: �Rejoice, for a new Golf is born.� Both cases
     were settled out of court.

   Here's the painting:

   Here's what appears to be the offending ad:
   [_40911951_girbaud_203body_afp.jpg]

   If this were the only incident in which European courts suppressed
   speech that I think should be protected, I wouldn't be that troubled
   -- but it seems to me to be part of a considerably broader pattern in
   which various ideas and expressions can be and are banned because
   they're offensive, whether based on race, sexual orientation, and
   religion.

   I'd hate to see this pattern imported into U.S. law. And
   unfortunately, [2]as some pro-internationalist scholars acknowledge,
   the more attention U.S. courts to pay to foreign legal norms, the more
   likely it is that those norms will eventually be used to narrow U.S.
   constitutional rights as well as to expand them.

References

   1. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1522140,00.html
   2. http://volokh.com/2003_09_28_volokh_archive.html#106519175194385361

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to