Posted by Eugene Volokh:
What Inconsistency?

   [1]Clayton Cramer disagrees with [2]Eric Muller's position on the
   religious book in the school library, but then goes on to say:

     Professor Muller's liberalism is really shining! Here's [3]another
     book that he wants not available: Michelle Malkin's In Defense of
     Internment, which is offered for sale at the Manzanar book store.

     Muller compares Malkin's book to David Irving's work; this is
     absurd. Malkin isn't denying that the internment happened; she is
     making an argument that it made sense under the circumstances. You
     can disagree with her argument without calling her a liar.

   I take it that Cramer is suggesting that Muller is somehow being
   untrue to his own "liberal" principles, but I don't quite see why. It
   seems quite reasonable to argue that the Manzanar book store, like
   other specialty government-run bookstores at historical sites, should
   only carry generally accurate history books.

   The bookstore must necessarily choose which books to carry: Presumably
   it doesn't carry every book ever written about the Japanese
   internment, but only those that it thinks are helpful to casual lay
   readers. And many of these readers are likely to read one book on the
   subject, rather than reading several to decide for themselves which
   are right and which are wrong. If Muller is right that Malkin's book
   is highly inaccurate -- even if it isn't as inaccurate as books that
   deny that the Holocaust took place -- then why should the government
   propagate such inaccurate views?

   Now there may well be some liberals who have articulated hardline
   views that any refusal by the government to carry a book, in any
   government-run bookstore or library, is a First Amendment violation
   (or is otherwise inappropriate). But I have no reason to think that
   Muller is one of them. What reason is there to condemn him for any
   supposed inconsistency with his "liberalism"?

References

   1. 
http://www.claytoncramer.com/weblog/2005_04_10_archive.html#111334280704108535
   2. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_04_10-2005_04_16.shtml#1113326389
   3. http://www.isthatlegal.org/archive/2005/04/is_there_a_davi.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to