Posted by Juan Non-Volokh:
Justice Breyer Defends Gun Possession:

   Well, kinda. In [1]Small v. United States, Justice Breyer writes the
   majority opinion holding that the federal prohibition on gun
   possession by any person "convicted in any court" of a crime
   punsishable by more than one year in jail does not apply to foreign
   convictions. Joining Justice Breyer on the side of the gun owner were
   Justices Stevens, O'Connor, Souter and Ginsburg. Justice Thomas
   dissented, joined by Jsutices Kennedy and Scalia, holding that a
   conviction in a Japanese court would qualify as "any court."

   The case is quite interesting on two levels. First, the justices one
   would expect to be most "pro-gun" ruled against the gun owner, while
   the justices one might expect to be most anti-gun came out the other
   way. On the other hand, the ideological line-up is precisely as one
   would expect if one focuses solely on the quesiton of statutory
   interpretation. Justice Thomas and the more conservative justices read
   the statute quite literally -- "any court" means any court -- even if
   it produced a non-conservative result; while the more liberal justices
   read "any court" in a broader context to determine its meaning apart
   from the literal meaning of the words.

   I also think the Small decisions are interesting because they
   completely avoid the elephant in the room: the Second Amendment. Even
   though the petitioner did not challenge the statute on Second
   Amendment grounds, or even suggest that the statute should be given a
   narrow reading so as to avoid potential Second Amendment problems, I
   might of thought one of the justices might have dropped a footnote to
   note the opinion did not address any potential Second Amendent
   concerns. Justice Thomas did this in his [2]Printz v. United States
   concurrence, so I found it interesting that neither Justice Thomas nor
   any other Justice did so here.

References

   1. 
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/26apr20050800/www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/03-750.pdf
   2. http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1478.ZC1.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to