Posted by Orin Kerr: Debating Affirmative Action in Law Schools: Writing in [1]Slate, Emily Bazelon contends that the critiques of Richard Sander's Stanford Law Review [2]article on affirmative action "pounce" on the argument, "destroy" it, and "throw" so many "punches" that the debate became a "bloodletting" that left Sander speechless. I haven't followed the back-and-forth very closely -- some of Sander's assumptions seemed a bit off to me when I first read his piece, but this is hardly my field -- but I'm wondering if any VC readers have read the critiques and agree with Bazelon's assessment. I have enabled comments; links to the various responses are availible in Bazelon's Slate piece.
References 1. http://slate.msn.com/id/2117745/ 2. http://www1.law.ucla.edu/~sander/Documents/Sander%20FINAL.pdf _______________________________________________ Volokh mailing list [email protected] http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh
