Posted by Todd Zywicki:
Andrew Sullivan on Michael Oakeshott:

   [1]This is a couple of years old, but I just stumbled across it. It is
   a lecture by Andrew Sullivan on Oakeshott.

   I love the way that Sullivan captures the experience and feeling of
   reading Oakeshott, the richness of the Oakeshott reading experience.
   Consider this passage:

     Oakeshott loved Shakespeare. In all the odd and quirky
     characters--from Falstaff to Bushy, from Benedik to Hamlet and
     Macbeth--he saw what a free society could create, not in terms of
     projects or goals or abstractions, but in terms of the human beings
     that are allowed to flourish with all their idiosyncrasies and
     faults and character traits.

     This was for Oakeshott a wonder to behold. Every person he met was
     a character, or at least a potential character. And he saw the
     point of liberal democracy as giving individuals the ability to
     more fully become themselves, to ripen and mature in all their
     idiosyncrasies and differences.

     All of life, Oakeshott argues, is an adventure. Let's see what I
     can become. Let's see what I can make of my life. Let's greet life
     and its difficulties and exigencies and unpredictable nature as an
     opportunity.

   In writing my article on "[2]The Rule of Law, Freedom, and Prosperity"
   a few years ago, in the end I finally decided that Oakeshott holds the
   key to understanding what the rule of law is all about. I think there
   is something going on in Oakeshott that is complementary but richer
   than Hayek's views on the rule of law. On the other hand, most readers
   don't fully understand Hayek's views on the rule of law either,
   resting their critique on Hayek's views as expressed in The
   Constitution of Liberty, rather than the fully developed views that
   come out in Law, Legislation, and Liberty. (I elaborate on this
   observation in the second half of [3]this article).

   You can find an excerpt from Oakeshott's classic essay "On Being
   Conservative" [4]here.

References

   1. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2185/is_2_14/ai_97874330/print
   2. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=323720
   3. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=524402
   4. http://www.aubg.bg/pos/pos101/Michael%20Oakeshott.htm

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to