Posted by Orin Kerr:
Professor Tribe and the Constitutional Moment:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_05_22-2005_05_28.shtml#1116737688


   [1]Lawrence Tribe has announced that he will no longer be updating his
   one-volume constitutional law treatise, American Constitutional Law.
   Although I haven't opened Tribe's treatise since I was a law student,
   it has a well-established reputation for having been quite influential
   over the last twenty-five years. As a result, Tribe's decision is a
   bit of an event (at least in geeky con law circles).
     Professor Tribe certainly didn't need to explain why he is no longer
   updating his work -- treatises are not life sentences -- but he [2]did
   so in a long letter to his readers. The explanation is quite
   fascinating. As I read it, the gist is that treatises are historically
   contingent products. Tribe started writing his treatise in the 1970s
   to try to justify and rationalize the Warren and Burger Court's work,
   including Roe v. Wade. At the time, writing a treatise made sense. But
   these days there is no recent revolution to have to analyze and
   explain. Further, if I understand him correctly, Tribe also reasons
   that the kinds of debates that are likely to shape constitutional
   doctrine in the next few years aren't ones he is likely to be able to
   influence. (At least I think that's what Tribe is saying; I wasn't
   entirely sure whether he was arguing that many people today have views
   that simply can't be reasoned with by anyone, or whether he was
   recognizing that he is viewed by many by the ascendant political right
   as too partisan to have his arguments taken at face value.)
     It's a fascinating letter, and anyone interested in the state of
   constitutional law today should read it. It's got lots of interesting
   tidbits, ranging from skepticism about claims of a "constitution in
   exile" movement (see p. 4) to questioning his 1991 position that the
   Courts should interpret the Constitution in light of technological
   change by simply "translating" the old doctrines to new ones (see
   footnote on p. 9).
     Thanks to [3]SCOTUSblog for the news, and for hosting a copy of the
   Tribe letter forthcoming in The Green Bag.

References

   1. 
http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2005/05/commentary_on_t.html
   2. 
http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/Tribe-Treatise-Green%20Bag%202005%20low%20res.pdf
   3. 
http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2005/05/commentary_on_t.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to