Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Huh?
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_05_22-2005_05_28.shtml#1117267217


   According to [1]an AP story,

     [2]American Gold Star Mothers Inc. [which apparently accepts for
     membership American citizens who are mothers of American soldiers
     who died in action] has rejected [Ligaya] Lagman, a Filipino, for
     membership because -� though a permanent resident and a taxpayer -�
     she is not a U.S. citizen.

     "There's nothing we can do because that's what our organization
     says: You have to be an American citizen," national President Ann
     Herd said Thursday. "We can't go changing the rules every time the
     wind blows." . . .

   Rules are rules! They were obviously handed down at Mt. Sinai. Or by
   the Founding Fathers. Or by Congress. Or, wait, maybe they're just
   something that our predecessors came up with, and that we are entitled
   to change. (My understanding is that nearly all such organizations
   indeed have the power to change their bylaws.)

   So forget about the rules are rules, and explain why this is a good
   rule. It's not an obviously ridiculous rule: Citizenship says
   something about a person, and a group that's set up in part to foster
   patriotic love of the U.S. may understandably want to limit its
   membership to U.S. citizens. Plus of course it's not like denying
   Lagman membership would be a vast harm to her.

   Yet it strikes me as something of a mean-spirited rule nonetheless.
   This is a mother of someone who died fighting for the U.S.; she lives
   in the U.S.; she wants to join an organization that honors soldiers
   who died fighting for the U.S. (the story suggests that the person who
   nominated her may be more interested in getting the organization to
   change its rules, but I have no reason to doubt that the mother
   sincerely sympathizes with the views of the organization). It's not
   like changing the rules will let some horde of furriners will
   overwhelm the organization and turn it to nefarious purposes. Would it
   kill them to include women like Ms. Lagman, women with whom they have
   far more in common than they have differences?

   But in any event, if they want to defend their position, it seems to
   me that they should defend it on the merits, rather than appealing to
   The Rules.

References

   1. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,157839,00.html
   2. http://www.goldstarmoms.com/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to