Posted by David Kopel: Abusive Anti-gun Lawsuit Rejected by Florida Appeals Court: http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_05_29-2005_06_04.shtml#1117728418
Yesterday the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeals [1]affirmed the trial court's entry of a judgement against the plaintiff in Grunow v. Valor. The case involved a lawsuit against the wholesaler of a small, old handgun which was stolen by a 13-year-old and used to murder a public school teacher. The plaintiff (the teacher's widow) had argued that the wholesaler was liable because the gun was defective, although, as I detailed in a 2002 [2]article, the plaintiff's theory would mean that almost all handguns are "defective." After a jury found the wholesaler 5% liable for the homicide, the trial court entered a judgement n.o.v., because the jury verdict was inconsistent. The intermediate court of appeals ruled that the verdict was not inconsistent, but that judgement against the plaintiff was proper, because well-established Florida precedent made it clear that there was no theory of negligence by which the wholesaler was liable. The manufacturer, Raven Arms, was not sued, because it is out of business. References 1. http://www.4dca.org/June2005/06-01-05/4D03-717.pdf 2. http://www.davekopel.com/NRO/2002/Gunned-Down.htm _______________________________________________ Volokh mailing list [email protected] http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh
