Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Saved by Our National Historical Illiteracy:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_02_12-2006_02_18.shtml#1140029564


   Just ran across a funny case from July 2005. Twenty-one-year-old Ohio
   residents Scott Christopher Wurgler and his twin brother Matthew Allen
   Wurgler, decided to change their names to Sacco Vandal and Vanzetti
   Vandal. No, said the magistrate, because "the name change would be
   contrary to public policy" (a general legal reason for why name change
   applications may be denied) -- the new name, he reasoned, was
   "synonymous with anarchism, wanton destruction and murder." (By the
   way, five years before, Ohio courts refused to let a man changed his
   name to "Santa Claus" because this "would mislead children and
   interfere with society's proprietary interest in the identity of a
   beloved icon.")

   Scott Wurgler objected, for four reasons -- (1) "he wanted a name that
   he himself selected," (2) the name "would reflect his Italian
   heritage," (3) "the new name has a pleasant ring to it and he wished
   to use the name in his rock band and in other business ventures," and
   (4) "the new name will help him in his future bid for public office"
   (uh, really?).

   The judge reviewing the magistrate's decision disagreed. "Few people
   are aware of the name 'Sacco' and its connection to the anarchist
   movement in 20th century America." "Even fewer would associate the
   name 'Vandal' with the Vandal hoards [sic] of Europe" -- "A check of a
   White Pages website reveals more than a dozen presumably law-abiding
   Ohioans with the surname of Vandal." "If the applicant is using the
   name change to make a statement to society . . . it is a subtle one.
   Most people won't 'get it' without a short history lesson and a long
   social commentary." Name change approved.

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to