Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Censorship Envy, Speech That's Offensive to Muslims, and European Law:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_02_12-2006_02_18.shtml#1140117468


   One recurring argument that I've seen from Muslims who want the
   cartoons legally suppressed is that European laws prohibit other kinds
   of speech offensive to other groups -- for instance, Holocaust denial,
   which is often restricted chiefly because it's seen as implicitly or
   explicitly anti-Semitic -- and that Muslims should get the same
   treatment. In practice, those laws don't get used that often, and
   European speech is actually more free than the laws would suggest.
   Nonetheless, the laws' presence does make possible the argument I
   describe; and I suspect it does make many Muslims feel even more
   aggrieved than they would be by the cartoons themselves, since they
   are also now aggrieved by what they see as discriminatorily enforced
   laws.

   Consider, just as one example among many, [1]Norwegian Penal Code
   secs. 135 & 135a (noted [2]here; thanks to [3]Rebecca Davidson for
   pointing to that article):

     § 135. Any person who endangers the general peace by publicly
     insulting or provoking hatred of the Constitution or any public
     authority or by publicly stirring up one part of the population
     against another, or who is accessory thereto, shall be liable to
     fines or to detention or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one
     year.

     § 135 a. Any person shall be liable to fines or imprisonment for a
     term not exceeding two years who by any utterance or other
     communication made publicly or otherwise disseminated among the
     public threatens, insults, or subjects to hatred, persecution or
     contempt any person or group of persons because of their creed,
     race, colour or national or ethnic origin. The same applies to any
     such offensive conduct towards a person or a group because of their
     homosexual bent, life-style, or inclination.

     The same penalty shall apply to any person who incites or is
     otherwise accessory to any act mentioned in the first paragraph.

   These belong to the family of restrictions on "hate speech" and
   "incitement to hostility" that Europeans (and some Americans)
   sometimes praise as a model "reasonable" alternative to America's
   speech protections. But look how broad they are: If you "endanger[]
   the general peace" by "publicly stirring up one part of the population
   against another," you can go to prison. If you disseminate a
   communication that "insult[s]" "any group of persons because of their
   creed," you can go to prison.

   Of course publication of the cartoons would be covered. My providing
   [4]a link to the cartoons (which I've done in many of my previous
   posts, since providing such a link is in my view necessary to helping
   people understand the controversy) would be a crime under Norwegian
   law: I would be an accessory to a communication that insults some
   Muslims because of their creed. And of course many Muslims would feel
   entitled to have this law enforced to protect their sensibilities.

   Many Muslims are surely offended enough by the cartoons on their own;
   but at least in America we can tell them to join the club -- American
   Christians have no legal protection from anti-Christian speech,
   American Jews have none from anti-Semitic speech, blacks have none
   from racist speech, Americans generally have none from anti-American
   speech. What can Norwegians tell them, other than (1) "Sorry, the laws
   don't protect you," (2) "OK, we'll enforce the laws to suppress this
   speech that insults you," or (3) "These are bad laws, we're glad that
   they've rarely been used, we're sorry they were ever enacted, and we
   are going to repeal them right away" (my preferred suggestion, though
   not one likely to be implemented, and one that would still be
   understandably offensive to many Muslims, since the laws' repeal would
   have been triggered by speech that's offensive to Muslims)?

References

   1. 
http://www.coe.int/T/E/Legal_affairs/Legal_co-operation/Conferences_and_high-level_meetings/European_Public_Prosecutors/00_Norway_Penal%20Code.asp#P2_31
   2. http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2006-02/15/article04.shtml
   3. http://rebeccafrog.livejournal.com/156808.html
   4. 
http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/12/10/un-to-investigate-jyllands-posten-racism/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to