Posted by Jim Lindgren:
Nobel Laureate Proposes Injecting Sulfur Into Atmosphere to Reduce Global 
Warming.--
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_07_23-2006_07_29.shtml#1154028231


   A couple months ago, I was looking at the patterns over time of sulfur
   pollution in the atmosphere and global warming. Sulfur emissions have
   long been known to reduce surface temperatures, as has been shown
   after large volcanic eruptions.

   I noticed that while sulfur emissions were growing in the two decades
   lasting into the early 1970s, temperatures were cooling slightly. At
   the time of the first Earth Day in 1970, this cooling led some
   academics to predict [1]a new Ice Age (though even in 1970, other
   researchers were [2]worried about global warming because of the longer
   trend). In response to concerns over sulfur pollution and the acid
   rain it caused, the U.S. and other countries cut back sulfur emissions
   substantially, which then corresponded with an increase in
   temperature.

   This led me to wonder about a possible contribution (however small) of
   pollution control to global warming. It also led me to concoct the
   goofy idea that perhaps introducing sulfur into the atmosphere could
   be considered as a way to cut down global temperature increases.
   Because my ignorance in environmental matters is considerable and my
   idea was based in part on what might have been a random correlation, I
   thought that my idea was too strange even to float on this blog.

   Then today I saw a [3]news article that reported on a new academic
   proposal to inject sulfur into the stratosphere. Apparently, the idea
   of using sulfur to reduce global warming has been kicked around for
   some years, though I hadn't heard of it.

   The author of the paper in the scholarly journal Climatic Change is
   Nobel laureate Paul Crutzen. I was able to download the [4]paper from
   this site, but that may have been because of my university's
   subscription to the journal.

   LiveScience [5]has the story (tip to [6]RawStory):

     One way to curb global warming is to purposely shoot sulfur into
     the atmosphere, a scientist suggested today.

     The burning of fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide, a greenhouse
     gas, into the atmosphere. It also releases sulfur that cools the
     planet by reflecting solar radiation away from Earth.

     Most researchers say the warming effect has been winning in recent
     decades.

     Injecting sulfur into the [stratosphere, which is about 9-31 miles
     above the surface] ... would reflect more sunlight back to space
     and offset greenhouse gas warming, according to Nobel laureate Paul
     Crutzen from the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Germany and
     the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California
     at San Diego.

     Crutzen suggests carrying sulfur into the atmosphere via balloons
     [or] using artillery guns to release it, where the particles would
     stay for up to two years. The results could be seen in six months.

     Nature does something like this naturally.

     When Mount Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, millions of
     tons of sulfur [were] injected into the atmosphere, enhancing
     reflectivity and cooling the Earth�s surface by an average of 0.9
     degrees Fahrenheit in the year following the eruption.

   Crutzen favors Kyoto and restrictions on greenhouse gases as the best
   approach, but believes that injecting sulfur may be easier to achieve
   politically. He also claims that injecting sulfur directly into the
   stratosphere would lead to many fewer health problems to humans than
   allowing more sulfur fuel burning on the surface of the planet.

References

   1. http://www.reason.com/0005/fe.rb.earth.shtml
   2. http://www.reason.com/0005/fe.rb.earth.shtml
   3. http://www.livescience.com/environment/060727_inject_sulfur.html
   4. 
http://www.springerlink.com/(pbdmbi55tjhvs445p3haed45)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,4,27;journal,1,222;linkingpublicationresults,1:100247,1#ContactOfAuthor1
   5. http://www.livescience.com/environment/060727_inject_sulfur.html
   6. http://rawstory.com/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to