Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Today Seems To Be State Constitutional Decision Excerpt Day:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_11_12-2006_11_18.shtml#1163716279


   From Beebe v. State, 6 Ind. 501 (1855), which struck down a law that
   banned the manufacturing of alcohol but excepted specially licensed
   manufacturing for distribution to the government for medical purposes
   (paragraph breaks added):

     And we may as well remark here as anywhere, that if the manufacture
     and sale of these articles are proper to be carried on in the state
     for any purpose, it is not competent for the government to take the
     business from the people and monopolize it.

     The government can not turn druggist and become the sole dealer in
     medicines in the state; and why? Because the business was, at and
     before the organization of the government, and is properly at all
     times, a private pursuit of the people, as much so as the
     manufacture and sale of brooms, tobacco, clothes, and the dealing
     in tea, coffee and rice, and the raising of potatoes; and the
     government was organized to protect the people in such pursuits
     from the depredations of powerful and lawless individuals, the
     barons of the middle ages, whom they were too weak to resist,
     single-handed, by force; and for the government now to seize upon
     those pursuits is subversive of the very object for which it was
     created, and is inconsistent with the right of private property in,
     and pursuits by, the citizen. "A government is guilty of an
     invasion upon the faculties of industry possessed by individuals,
     when it appropriates to itself a particular branch of industry, the
     business of exchange and brokerage for example; or when it sells
     the exclusive privilege of conducting it." Say's Political Economy,
     note to p. 134.

     There are undertakings of a public character, such as the making of
     public highways, providing a uniform currency, &c., that a single
     individual has not power to accomplish, and which government must
     therefore prosecute: but they are not the ordinary pursuits of the
     private citizen. These, certainly, as the general rule, and we are
     not now prepared to name an exception, the government can not
     engage in. This is all we shall here say upon this point. Time and
     space forbid that we should elaborate all that arise in the case.

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to