Posted by Orin Kerr: My Apologies: http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_11_19-2006_11_25.shtml#1164514423
Raldey's [1]latest post makes clear that my earlier post badly misunderstood his position. My apologies. In its Fourth Amendment cases, the Supreme Court routinely refers to "invasion" of a home to mean any physical access, and I assumed Radley was using the word in the way the Supreme Court does, not in a special sense to refer only to no-knock paramilitary raids. I don't know why Radley seems to think my misunderstanding was in bad faith; it wasn't. In any event, I regret the misunderstanding. References 1. http://www.theagitator.com/archives/027261.php#027261 _______________________________________________ Volokh mailing list [email protected] http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh
