Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Big Environmental Grant:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_12_31-2007_01_06.shtml#1168117311


   Yesterday the Supreme Court [1]granted cert in another significant
   environmental law case -- actually two combined cases, National
   Association of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife and EPA v.
   Defenders of Wildlife -- concerning the extent to which the Endangered
   Species Act (ESA) requires federal agencies to avoid actions that
   could harm endangered species when such a requirement could conflict
   with an agency's other statutory obligations. As Lyle Denniston
   [2]notes on SCOTUSBlog:

     The endangered species case grows out of a move by the state of
     Arizona to take over from EPA the program of regulating permits for
     discharge of pollutants under the Clean Water Act. The Court
     granted both cases, and added to the review the question of whether
     the EPA decision to transfer this permitting authority was wrongly
     based upon inconsistent views of the Endangered Species Act and, if
     so, whether the case should have been sent back to EPA for further
     review.

   Here is the [3]petition, [4]opp, and [5]reply brief.

References

   1. 
http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/01/court_to_hear_s_2.html
   2. 
http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/01/court_to_hear_s_2.html
   3. http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2006/2pet/7pet/2006-0549.pet.aa.html
   4. http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/06-549BIO.pdf
   5. http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2006/2pet/7pet/2006-0549.pet.rep.pdf

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to