Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Banner Day at D.C. Circuit:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_01_07-2007_01_13.shtml#1168619232


   The [1]U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit handed down [2]six
   published opinions today, several of which seem notable (though I have
   not had the chance to read them all yet). Among today's opinions are:
     * - [3]Doe v. ExxonMobil Corp., a divided opinion on the
       justiciability of claims brought under the Alien Tort Statute and
       the Torture Victims Protection Act, in addition to various common
       law claims, based upon ExxonMobil's alleged complicity with human
       rights abuses in Indonesia. Judge Sentelle wrote the majority for
       himself and Judge Edwards; Judge Kavanaugh dissented.
     * - [4]United States v. Henry, another opinion sorting out the
       implications of Booker (among other things). The court's opinion
       is per curiam, but Judges Henderson and Kavanaugh wrote separate
       concurring opinions.
     * - [5]NARUC v. FERC, an otherwise unanimous opinion reviewing a
       Federal Energy Regulatory Commission order splits over the
       question of whether FERC has the authority to adopt rules that
       regulate the use of the states' eminent domain power by or on
       behalf of utilities. Judge Sentelle's partial dissent says the
       answer is "no." Judge Williams' majority opinion argues FERC is
       not really regulating the states' use of eminent domain.
     * - [6]CREW v. FEC, a opinion finding that Citizens for
       Responsibility and Ethics in Washington lacked standing to
       challenge the Federal Election Commission's resolution of its
       complaint alleging that Grover Norquist and Americans for Tax
       Reform illegally gave the Republican Party an in-kind corporate
       contribution, in the form of a list of conservative activists.

   I've oversimplified these cases in my summaries (in part because I've
   only skimmed them myself), so I apologize in advance if I've missed
   important aspects of these cases. I hope to post more on at least some
   of them, even if only to provide links to fuller discussions and
   analyses on other blogs.

References

   1. http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/internet.nsf
   2. http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinday/200701/070112.htm
   3. http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200701/05-7162a.pdf
   4. http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200701/04-3076a.pdf
   5. http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200701/04-1148a.pdf
   6. http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200701/06-5014a.pdf

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to