Posted by David Bernstein:
Carter and the Jews:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_01_14-2007_01_20.shtml#1168914042


   [1]Ha'aretz columnist Brad Burston:

     What Carter reveals, in the end, is that he knows the organized
     Jewish community of the United States in ways he will never know
     the Jewish community - or for that matter, the Palestinian
     community - in the Holy Land. He knows America's Jewish leadership
     as do few American Jews. He was, after all, twice the nominee of
     the Democratic Party.

     These people elected him president. They applauded him at Camp
     David. They sang his praises for forging the first peace treaty
     between Israel and an Arab nation.

     Carter knows these people, all right. He knows their
     vulnerabilities, their gut fears, their feelings for Israel. He
     knows what makes them tick. He knows what makes them squirm. He
     knows what makes them livid with rage. And Carter plays them, all
     of them, all at once, with the brio of a virtuoso on his farewell
     concert tour.

   The thesis that Carter is "out to get" the American Jewish leadership
   is an interesting one. It's not exactly true that the Jewish
   leadership was enthusiastic for Carter, except for a brief time
   following the Camp David Accord (which in many ways came about
   despite, rather than because of Carter, who preferred an international
   peace conference including the Soviet Union!) Jewish leaders mostly
   supported Scoop Jackson in the '76 primaries. Many implicitly or
   explicitly supported Ted Kennedy in the 1980 primaries. And Carter got
   less than half the Jewish vote in 1980, a remarkably bad performance
   considering that Ronald Reagan's political predecessor, Barry
   Goldwater, received about 10% of the Jewish vote in 1964, compared to
   Reagan's 40% (Anderson's 15% rounded out the total). Of course, even
   100% of the relatively small Jewish vote wouldn't have put Carter over
   the top in 2000, but the hostility of a large part of the Jewish
   community, which is a core constituency of the Democratic Party, made
   his life a lot more difficult.

   Of course, I can't read Carter's mind, but something has to explain
   [2]obviously misleading statements like this: "My most troubling
   experience has been the rejection of my offers to speak, for free,
   about the book on university campuses with high Jewish enrollment and
   to answer questions from students and professor." This sounds a lot
   like Carter claiming that the Jewish establishment has the will an
   dpower to stop universities from hosting an ex-president who
   volunteers to speak "for free." So here's a challenge to Mr. Carter:
   name even ONE university where you were unable to speak "for
   free"--and I mean really "for free", not a situation in which the
   university has to [3]pay for a private plane to take you roundtrip
   from Georgia, and pay additional thousands for your security.

   Oh, he didn't really mean "for free," he just meant "without an
   honorarium?" Perhaps he was just trying to "stimulate discussion"
   about the Jewish establishment's influence, his equally lame excuse
   for using the term "apartheid" to discuss the Israeli occupation of
   the territories, even though you [4]acknowledge that this occupation
   [which Israel offered to end in Camp David in 2000] has nothing to do
   with "racism."

References

   1. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/813159.html
   2. 
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-carter8dec08,0,7999232.story?coll=la-home-commentary
   3. 
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/12/26/brandeis_is_urged_to_bring_in_carter/
   4. http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/AntiSemi/10087.htm

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to