Posted by Ilya Somin:
Ronald Reagan on Immigration:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_05_20-2007_05_26.shtml#1180077450


   Conservative Republican have been [1]outdoing each other in claiming
   the mantle of Ronald Reagan. Ironically, however, many conservatives
   are simultaneously outdoing each other in advocating immigration
   restriction - a stance Reagan would probably have abhorred.

   As Reagan biographer Lou Cannon points out [2]in this book (pg. 119),
   Reagan proposed a treaty allowing for full freedom of movement for all
   workers throughout North America in his November 1979 speech
   announcing his candidacy for the presidency. As early as 1952 - at a
   time when US immigration policy was still governed by the highly
   restrictive legislation passed in the 1920s - Reagan gave a speech
   embracing nearly unlimited immigration:

   I

     . . . have thought of America as a place in the divine scheme of
     things that was set aside as a promised land . . . [A]nd the price
     of admission was very simple . . . Any place in the world and any
     person from these places; any person with the courage, with the
     desire to tear up their roots, to strive for freedom, to attempt
     and dare to live in a strange and foreign place, to travel halfway
     across the world was welcome here . . . I believe that God in
     shedding his grace on this country has always in this divine scheme
     of things kept an eye on our land and guided it as a promised land
     for these people. (emphasis added).

     Cannon, pg. 119.

   Almost forty years later, in his [3]January 1989 farewell message to
   the nation, Reagan struck a similar theme:

     I've spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don't
     know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it. But in
     my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than
     oceans, wind-swept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all
     kinds living in harmony and peace; a city with free ports that
     hummed with commerce and creativity. And if there had to be city
     walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with
     the will and the heart to get here. (emphasis added)

   In between, Reagan [4]pushed for his 1979 North American accord
   proposal (which eventually became the NAFTA treaty), and signed the
   1986 immigration reform law that amnestied almost 3 million illegal
   immigrants in exchange for relatively weak enforcement measures.

   As his 1979 proposal and his support for the 1986 amnesty suggest,
   Reagan did demonize illegal immigrants as some conservatives do today.
   He sought to enable them to legalize their status, and set many on the
   road to citizenship. While Reagan's rhetorical embrace of "anyone" who
   wants to come the US probably should be taken literally, it certainly
   indicates a generally positive attitude towards large-scale
   immigration from all parts of the world.

   The fact that Reagan supported something does not by itself prove that
   it is right, or even that it is the right position for conservatives.
   Reagan certainly made his share of mistakes, such as the extremely
   grave error of trading arms for hostages with Iran. But as Cannon
   notes, Reagan's positive attitude towards immigration was not just an
   isolated issue position, but was integrally linked to his generally
   optimistic and open vision of America. I would add that it also drew
   on his understanding that America is not a zero-sum game between
   immigrants and natives - just as he also recognized that it is not a
   zero-sum game between the rich and the poor. Immigration could promote
   prosperity and advancement for both groups in much the same way that
   free trade benefits both Americans and foreigners. Reagan probably did
   not have a detailed understanding of [5]the economics of comparative
   advantage which underpins this conclusion. But he surely understood it
   intuitively. Those who reject Reagan's position on immigration must,
   if they are to be consistent, also reject much of the rest of his
   approach to economic and social policy. Today's conservatives can
   argue for immigration restrictions if they so choose. But they should
   not claim the mantle of Reagan in doing so.

References

   1. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2986193&page=1
   2. http://www.amazon.com/Governor-Reagan-His-Rise-Power/dp/1586480308
   3. http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1989/011189i.htm
   4. http://www.cato.org/dailys/06-24-04.html
   5. http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2006/01/where_eugenics.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to