Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Brownback on Evolution:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_05_27-2007_06_02.shtml#1180623275


   At the first Republican Presidential debate, Senator Sam Brownback was
   among those who raised his hand when asked if any of the candidates
   did not believe in evolution. Today Senator Brownback takes to the New
   York Times op-ed page to [1]try and explain his position.

     The premise behind the question seems to be that if one does not
     unhesitatingly assert belief in evolution, then one must
     necessarily believe that God created the world and everything in it
     in six 24-hour days. But limiting this question to a stark choice
     between evolution and creationism does a disservice to the
     complexity of the interaction between science, faith and reason.

     The heart of the issue is that we cannot drive a wedge between
     faith and reason. I believe wholeheartedly that there cannot be any
     contradiction between the two. The scientific method, based on
     reason, seeks to discover truths about the nature of the created
     order and how it operates, whereas faith deals with spiritual
     truths. The truths of science and faith are complementary: they
     deal with very different questions, but they do not contradict each
     other because the spiritual order and the material order were
     created by the same God.

   Senator Brownback wants to argue that religious faith in a divine
   creator is compatible with the science of evolution, but he can't
   bring himself to embrace any aspects of evolutionary theory that are
   rejected by creationists. He explicitly accepts microevolution and
   rejects evolution insofar as it entails "an exclusively materialistic,
   deterministic vision," carefully eliding over his views of evolution's
   role in speciation. It's as if he wants to appear to take a position
   while leaving plenty of room to spin his views to various
   constituencies -- or, as [2]Jack Balkin suggests here -- pretend to
   engage the subject with intellectual sophistication while continuing
   to reject the scientific validity of evolution.

References

   1. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/opinion/31brownback.html
   2. http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/05/no-sam-brownback-doesnt-believe-in.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to