Posted by Orin Kerr:
Justice Ginsburg Speaks:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_05_27-2007_06_02.shtml#1180630245


   In Thursday's [1]New York Times, Linda Greenhouse had a very
   interesting essay on how outspoken Justice Ginsburg has become in her
   dissents, particularly in cases that touch on the Supreme Court's role
   in the political system:

     The justice�s acquaintances have watched with great interest what
     some depict as a late-career transformation. �Her style has always
     been very ameliorative, very conscious of etiquette,� said Cynthia
     Fuchs Epstein, the sociologist and a longtime friend. �She has
     always been regarded as sort of a white-glove person, and she�s
     achieved a lot that way. Now she is seeing that basic issues she�s
     fought so hard for are in jeopardy, and she is less bound by what
     have been the conventions of the court.�
     Some might say her dissents are an expression of sour grapes over
     being in the minority more often than not. But there may be
     strategic judgment, as well as frustration, behind Justice
     Ginsburg�s new style. She may have concluded that quiet
     collegiality has proved futile and that her new colleagues, Chief
     Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., are
     not open to persuasion on the issues that matter most to her.

      I'm just speculating, of course, but my tentative guess is the same
   as Debra Ness's: "She�s sounding an alarm and wants people to take
   notice." It's the same reaction I had to [2]Ginsburg's warning about
   the Term back in January.
     The question is, why? One theory is that Ginsburg's goal is the same
   as Justice Blackmun's near the end of his career: to influence the
   outcome of the next Presidential election by rallying the troops. In
   his Planned Parenthood v. Casey dissent, in 1992, Justice Blackmun
   seemed to be speaking to voters: "I am 83 years old," Blackmun wrote.
   "I cannot remain on this Court forever, and when I do step down, the
   confirmation process for my successor well may focus on the issue
   before us today." Get the hint? A year later, Clinton was elected, and
   within two years Blackmun and Justice White had resigned and been
   replaced with Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. This is just speculation,
   obviously, but I wonder if Ginsburg has Blackmun's efforts in mind.
   (Of course, if true, that doesn't mean Ginsburg herself is considering
   retiring after the next election; she may just want to influence the
   political system to increase the chances that future colleagues share
   her views.)

References

   1. 
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/washington/31scotus.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
   2. http://volokh.com/posts/1170108991.shtml

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to