Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Thoughts from Janet Hoeffel, Author of a Very Successful Student Note:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_07_08-2007_07_14.shtml#1184111717
As I mentioned [1]last month, one occasionally sees a student law
review article that is cited a great deal by courts -- even a lot more
than are most articles by tenured academics. Of the student articles
I've seen that are published since 1990, the one most cited by courts
is Janet Hoeffel's The Dark Side of DNA Profiling: Unreliable
Scientific Evidence Meets the Criminal Defendant (Stan. L. Rev. 1990),
which has been cited by over 25 cases and over 90 academic works.
I therefore thought I'd ask Prof. Hoeffel, who now teaches law at
Tulane, some questions about her article, so that other prospective
authors may get some guidance or at least inspiration. Prof. Hoeffel
kindly replied:
1. Why did you decide to write -- and publish -- your article?
I would love to say I had high and mighty goals in mind in my
decision to write a Note. Nope. A mere requirement of the Stanford
Law Review. I have always been a good worker bee -- I do what I am
told. I reach for the next brass ring as I was taught. I published
the Note because the Review accepted it and I was flattered.
I have to tell you, though, that the topic was so hot that I
completely burned myself out trying to constantly update the
article. I skipped class and worked long hours into the night.
Again, the ideals driving me were not high and mighty -- mere
perfectionism. If I was going to publish it, it had to include
every last speck of information out there on DNA, down to the most
recent news article. I never in a million years dreamed the article
would prove to be so useful. 2. How did you get the idea for the
article?
I scoured the earth for an idea for my Note, and flipped through
the card catalogue (remember those?) and came across something on
"DNA fingerprinting," as they called it. At that point, only one
person had written an article about the new use of DNA typing. I
was always strong in the sciences and forensic science interested
me. I knew I was going to become a public defender so I set out to
see whether this new science was ready for the prosecution of the
criminally accused. 3. Did you find you learned useful things --
whether about writing, about legal reasoning generally, or just
about the area you were discussing -- while writing the article?
4. Have you found that having published the article has helped you
in your career?
What I found most useful was not the writing of the article
(although I can blue book the hell out of an article), but the
actual knowledge I acquired. I became an instant expert because so
few judges or lawyers understood the science, or its fallacies.
When I became a staff attorney at the Public Defender Service in
Washington, DC, I did trainings on DNA typing, and someone dubbed
me the "Barry Scheck" of the office. I have given other trainings
as well and people, amazingly enough, still turn to me as the
expert.
The Note helped me get hired as a judicial clerk, at the public
defenders, at a private firm, and obviously, it also helped me to
get a job as a law professor, because I was ten years out of law
school when I applied, with only this Note under my belt. The Note
won an award or two in law school, so that helped pad the resume as
well.
The most rewarding aspect of all of this, though, was its
usefulness to courts and litigants. I am pretty certain that none
of my articles will ever be as useful as that one was.
References
1. http://volokh.com/posts/1182276531.shtml
_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh
