Posted by David Bernstein:
Universal Health Care:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_07_08-2007_07_14.shtml#1184184287


   Some comments to Ilya's post on Brink Lindsey reminded me that I get
   puzzled when I see libertarian and conservative think tanks (and
   individuals) go ballistic whenever anyone suggests having the
   government require "universal health care." See, e.g., the
   controversies in Massachusetts and California. It seems to me we
   already have universal health care; by federal statute, anyone has the
   right to show up at any hospital emergency room in the country, and
   get whatever care they need regardless of their ability to pay. Now,
   admittedly, this is an especially dumb kind of universal health care,
   because it neglects primary care, focuses on especially expensive
   emergency care, and turns emergency rooms into family physician's
   office (except, to avoid draconian liability under federal law,
   emergency rooms will be much more eager to order every possible test
   under the sun, lest they be accused of neglected their federal law
   obligations). The costs of such care, along with whatever other costs
   to the health care system the uninsured are able to pass on (bills not
   paid, contagious diseases spread, whatever), are paid by the rest of
   us, as surely as if they came out of the tax system. Moreover, healthy
   individuals who rely on the safety net for their care instead of
   paying for their own insurance (as well as employers who don't provide
   insurance) are free-riding on the rest of us. I'm against socialized
   medicine, and I'm against a single-payer system, (and I'm against
   Medicare for that matter, which not only subsidizes many well-off
   rich, but could hardly be better designed to waste money if it were
   done intentionally), but I simply can't get up in arms about
   "universal health care." We have a version of it already, but it's
   just a stupid and counterproductive version, and I'm willing to listen
   to alternatives that are less costly and more efficient, even if it
   means that the government is more directly involved, as with employer
   mandates.

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to