Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Would a Smaller Ninth Circuit Get Reversed Less Often?
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_07_08-2007_07_14.shtml#1184202767


   Vanderbilt law professor [1]Brian Fitzpatrick looks at the U.S. Court
   of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (where he clerked), and how it fared
   before the Supreme Court this past year.

     The 9th Circuit, which hears appeals in federal cases in the
     Western United States, is the largest of the 13 such courts, with
     28 active judges and more than 20 part-time senior judges. The 9th
     Circuit is almost three times the size of an average court of
     appeals, and its jurisdiction stretches from Alaska to Arizona, an
     area comprising nearly one-fifth of the American population.

     The 9th Circuit also has a long-running streak as the most
     overturned, which went unbroken this year. The Supreme Court
     reviewed 22 cases from the 9th Circuit last term, and it reversed
     or vacated 19 times. By comparison, the Supreme Court reviewed only
     five cases, vacating or reversing four, from the next-busiest court
     of appeals, the 5th Circuit based in New Orleans.

     In other words, although the 9th Circuit decided only one-third
     more appeals on the merits than the 5th Circuit, it was reversed
     nearly five times more often.

   Noting the Ninth Circuit's high rate of reversal is nothing new. What
   Fitzpatrick adds, however, is an explanation of how the Ninth
   Circuit's large size may contribute to the high reversal rate.
   Specifically, he argues that as the number of judges on the Ninth
   Circuit increases, the likelihood that it will issue outlier opinions
   increases.

     Consider a hypothetical court of 28 judges (the number of active
     judges currently on the 9th Circuit), in which six of the judges
     are extreme. The probability of such a court randomly selecting a
     panel with at least two extreme judges is almost 11%. But if it
     were divided into two courts � each with 14 judges, three of whom
     are extreme � that probability falls to 9%.

     A difference of 1% or 2% may not seem like much, but the 9th
     Circuit decides more than 6,000 cases every year. This means that
     if the 9th Circuit is anything like my hypothetical court,
     splitting it in half would save 60 to 120 appeals a year from being
     decided by panels with a majority of extreme judges.

   On this basis, Fitzpatrick concludes that as long as the Ninth Circuit
   remains disproportionately large, it will continue to issue "extreme"
   opinions at a disproportionate rate, and "it is likely to continue
   being disproportionately reversed by the Supreme Court."

References

   1. 
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-fitzpatrick11jul11,0,6274474.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to