Posted by Jonathan Adler:
"Oil Industry Reality Check":
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_07_15-2007_07_21.shtml#1184698542


   Timothy Muris and Richard Parker, officials at the Federal Trade
   Commission under the Bush and Clinton Administrations respectively,
   have an [1]op-ed in today's Wall $treet Journal urging lawmakers to
   recognize the competitive reality of today's oil industry before
   adopting additional regulations and controls. Here's a taste:

     We've spent years at the Federal Trade Commission enforcing the
     antitrust laws in this industry and even more time studying oil
     markets. We have come to this conclusion: When legislators don't
     completely understand the industry, even their best efforts can
     harm consumers.

     Consider one driver of harmful regulation, the belief that a
     handful of large oil companies control the industry. In fact, the
     industry is not highly concentrated. The four largest firms
     collectively hold a smaller share than the top four firms in many
     other industries, and these firms face a lot of competition. Valero
     is the largest U.S. refiner and non-oil companies like Wal-Mart,
     Sheetz and WaWa sell a significant portion of retail gasoline. Most
     gas stations are owned and operated independently.

     The oil industry's long-term earnings are also typically in line
     with other industries. Recently, the oil industry has earned
     above-average profits -- 9.5 cents for each dollar in sales in
     2006, compared to 8.2 cents for manufacturers. But U.S. oil took a
     hit in the 1990s as earnings fell well below those of other
     industries.

     And as economic learning and antitrust enforcement have evolved,
     we've seen that big and profitable are not necessarily bad. In
     recent decades, the real oil industry has greatly improved its
     efficiency through a series of mergers, which have improved
     resource management, increased innovation and technology diffusion,
     and moved assets to firms with the ability and expertise to expand
     capacity. Extensive FTC studies have confirmed that the industry is
     highly competitive, that concentration and mergers have not
     increased prices, and that market forces -- most notably the price
     of crude oil and supply shocks -- cause price increases. . . .

     What we need are policies that let the market operate to spur
     investment in exploration, capacity expansion, operating
     efficiencies and technology advances.

     Instead, Congress is proposing to exacerbate America's energy
     problems. Some want to make price gouging -- a vague term with no
     clear legal meaning -- a crime. Such legislation would discourage
     the industry from responding rapidly to product shortages. As bad
     as high prices are, no gas at all, or a return to gas lines, is
     much worse. Moreover, price gouging laws will harm consumers by
     reducing investment in new refineries.

References

   1. 
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118463467039168409.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to