Posted by Eugene Volokh:
OK, Parse This for an Israeli or Armenian Lawyer Who Works at Your Firm:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_07_15-2007_07_21.shtml#1184802030


   From the fourth edition of the Vault / Minority Corporate Counsel
   Association survey:

     4. For this survey, minorities are defined as those whose race is
     other than White/Caucasian and include African-American/Black,
     Hispanic/Latino, Alaskan/American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander,
     Middle Eastern and Multiracial. If your firm has not tracked and
     does not have data for one or more of these categories (such as
     Middle Eastern), you may include a footnote explaining which
     categories are not recognized by your firm. For example: "The
     totals above for minority men and minority women do not include
     Middle Eastern associates." Please note that for the purposes of
     this survey, "White" means "White/Caucasian" and does not include
     "White/Hispanic."

   So is the Israeli a minority because he is Middle Eastern? Is he not a
   minority because it is not the case that his "race is other than
   White/Caucasian" -- but if that's so, then how would most Middle
   Easterners be minorities, given that under all the standard racial
   definitions with which I'm familiar Middle Easterners are considered
   white or Caucasian? Is the Israeli only a minority if his forbears
   case from the Middle East, as opposed to being from (say) Poland or
   Russia, and, if so, what should he do if he thinks your 2000-years-ago
   forbears did come from the Middle East?

   Or are you supposed to say, "I know what the MCCA means, Israelis
   aren't real Middle Easterners or real minorities, because they're too
   Western, Middle Easterner means ..." -- means what exactly? Just
   people from poor middle Eastern countries? How about people whose
   well-educated parents left Iran following the fall of the Shah?
   Saudis? Are you supposed to try to decide based on how much
   discrimination the Middle Easterners are likely to face or have faced
   in America?

   OK, now tell me what you do with Armenians. Does it matter whether
   they are from Soviet Armenia, Iran, or the Armenian diaspora? (I
   should note, by the way, that there are a lot of Armenian law students
   at least in the L.A. area.) Do they have to be Middle-Eastern-looking,
   as opposed to more East-European-looking?

   I realize, of course, that there is imprecision in all measurement
   systems, and the imprecision, the opportunities for gamesmanship, and
   the difficulty to which people are put when they have to figure out
   identity labels for themselves and colleagues aren't reasons enough to
   abandon such inquiries. But they are costs to be kept in mind --
   especially as groups keep getting added, and the costs and imprecision
   (who's "Middle Eastern"? "Asian"? "Hispanic"/"Latino"? "with
   disabilities or physical challenges"?) mount.

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to