Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Volokh Commenters Get Noticed:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_09-2007_09_15.shtml#1189712188


   Someone at the [1]Atlanta Journal-Constitution liked our [2]"mentee"
   thread -- and [3]quoted a substantial chunk, all from the commenters:

     he verbal warfare broke out late last month on "The Volokh
     Conspiracy," a blog run by UCLA law Professor Eugene Volokh. The
     squabble began during a discussion of misspellings, when one poster
     took off on the word "mentee."

     I find "mentee" [said he] so offensive that I disparage its usage
     at every opportunity. While I will reluctantly overlook the use of
     "mentor" as a verb (that battle is lost), I refuse to acknowledge
     the existence of the verb "to ment" that "mentee" necessarily
     implies. Resumes containing this word require no further review. I
     reserve such vitriol and summary dismissal for this error alone.
     This is because it is what might be called a Homeric error. And I
     don't mean Homer Simpson.

     Yankev's post: What else do you call the subject of a mentor?

     I still vote for protege.

     Mentee sounds too much like the endangered sea cows that inhabit
     Florida's coastal waters.

     Was that your mentee I saw you with at lunch?

     No, that's not the person I ment.

     Uggh. Mentee may be a word, but so is puke.

     Ex parte McCardle's post: How about "lickspittle," a great old word
     which has fallen into unwarranted desuetude?

     AK: I might recognize "mentee" as a word, but I will never
     recognize "Mentos" as a food.

     James Fulford: What else do you call the subject of a mentor?

     Telemachus?

     Tim Dowling: My recollection is that during the Bush I
     Administration, EPA's chief of staff issue a memo banning the use
     of the word "proactive" because, in his words, "it's not a word."
     Evidently, he didn't like it, word-wise speaking. By the way,
     mentoring has its own month, January. IT'S THE LAW. Go forth and
     ment.

     NaG: I propose that "the" is not a word. It means nothing. There is
     nothing about "the" that adds meaning to a subsequent word. "The
     pig" has no different meaning than simply "pig"; "the" can simply
     be inferred from the noun itself.

     BobH: Eliminate article!!

     JohnEMack: Would other passive forms be better? How about "mentess"
     for female epigones? Or "mented," which permits us to call former
     students "demented."

   Good work, folks!

References

   1. 
http://www.ajc.com/search/content/opinion/stories/2007/09/02/mentee09021.html
   2. http://www.volokh.com/posts/chain_1187887242.shtml
   3. 
http://www.ajc.com/search/content/opinion/stories/2007/09/02/mentee09021.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to