Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Inartful:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_23-2007_09_29.shtml#1190659489


   Here's a question that I posed to [1]Erin McKean, and that she
   graciously agreed to answer in the next few days.

   The general question is: How do (and should) lexicographers decide
   whether to include a word in the dictionary?

   The concrete example, contributed by Widener lawprof Ben Barros, is
   offered by the words "inartful" and "inartfully." Prof. Barros and I
   were both shocked to learn that the two words weren't in the OED or
   any dictionary accessible via onelook.com.

   Some 20 years ago, William Safire [2]wrote about inartful, and said
   "it is not a word." But of course that's wrong: It's a word that
   lawyers use often, though generally without recognizing it as
   legalese, and that nonlawyers seem to use on occasion as well.

   A Lexis search through MEGA;MEGA for inartful! and date(> 1/1/2007)
   uncovers over 600 uses this year alone. Searches for past uses reveal
   published cases or summaries of lawyers' arguments using that term
   dating back to 1832. A search through a database of scanned 1700s
   English books found references from 1751 (Edward Kimber's The Life and
   Adventures of Joe Thompson 244 (2d ed.)) and 1759 (Samuel Derrick's
   [3][?] A General View of the Stage 26 (1759)). Kimber used it to mean
   "artlessly," but Derrick used it to mean "unskillfully," which seems
   to be the dominant modern meaning.

   For whatever it's worth, unartful and unartfully do appear in
   Webster's 1913 Revised Unabridged Dictionary, though Google suggests
   that unartfully is over 30 times less common than inartfully.

   So my questions to Ms. Mckean: Any thoughts on why the word isn't in
   the dictionaries, how lexicographers would decide whether to include
   it, and what people should do in the meantime?

References

   1. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_23-2007_09_29.shtml#1190393309
   2. 
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9F01E1DF1038F937A3575BC0A963948260
   3. http://www.jstor.org/view/01496611/dm981135/98p09296/0

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to