Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Energy Prizes Instead of Subsidies:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_23-2007_09_29.shtml#1190669534


   It is "energy week" at NRO. My first contribution to this series of
   articles on energy policy is [1]this article arguing that
   government-sponsored prizes for energy innovation would be more
   effective than traditional subsidies at encouraging the development of
   low-carbon-emission energy technologies.

     Direct government subsidies are a particularly poor way to
     encourage innovation. Perhaps it should be possible to direct
     research and development funds toward the most promising and
     valuable technological endeavors, but this rarely happens in
     practice. Government subsidies tend to be dispersed on political
     criteria, rewarding large, politically connected incumbent firms,
     rather than innovative upstarts. Failing industrial dinosaurs with
     lobbyists on the payroll are in much better position to snatch up
     government goodies than revolutionary thinkers toiling in garages
     or private labs.

     Offering substantial financial rewards for those who develop
     particular innovations or solve specific problems is a far better
     way to spur technological innovation and practical scientific
     research. As the patent system demonstrates, the hope of a large
     financial windfall is a powerful inducement for innovation, and can
     encourage many different people with different strategies or
     insights to tackle a given problem. If climate change is an urgent
     threat, and the private sector underfunds climate-related research
     and development, government funding of prizes along the Virgin
     Earth model could yield substantial returns.

   Over at The Corner, [2]Iain Murray makes the point that it is no
   accident politicians prefer subsidies to prizes, as subsidies
   facilitate patronage in a fashion that prizes do not. This is one
   reason that government-sponsored prizes are relatively rare, and a
   reason why replacing existing subsidies is politically difficult.

References

   1. 
http://energy.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YTQwNzY2ZGRhMGM5MGQ0NjdmMTlhNjVjZDdkZTY4NjE=
   2. 
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Yzg0MThlYzFlMDA1MjY0NGM2NjlhOGM2ODQ0YzhiNjk=

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to