Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Foul Winds for Alternative Energy:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_23-2007_09_29.shtml#1190990531


   Renewable energy sources offer many potential environmental benefits,
   including the reduction of air pollution, carbon emissions, and other
   consequences of energy extraction and production. To date, however,
   many renewable energy sources have had difficulty breaking into energy
   production markets. Despite decades of federal subsidies and other
   support, it often remains difficult to offer renewable energy at a
   competitive rate.

   Many argue that the best way to promote renewable energy sources, such
   as wind power, is to offer yet more federal subsidies, tax incentives,
   and the like. In [1]this article on NRO -- another contribution to
   NRO's [2]"Energy Week" -- I suggest a different tack: Reducing
   regulatory obstacles to alternative energy projects. One of the
   largest hurdles for major wind projects, for example, are regulatory
   requirements that increase costs, induce delays, and offer NIMBY
   activists opportunity to strangle such projects in the crib. Though
   well-intentioned, some of the regulatory requirements imposed on wind,
   wave, and other power projects have the effect of stalling the advance
   of alternative energy technologies. I conclude:

     Alternative energy advocates often bemoan the lack of a �level
     playing field� for renewable energy, recommending additional
     federal subsidies as the solution. Yet renewable energy sources
     already receive generous financial support from the Department of
     Energy and other government sources. In practice, such funding does
     little to bring commercially viable facilities on line.

     To promote alternative energy development, there�s no need for more
     handouts. Instead the government should get out of the way. If the
     goal is to increase actual alternative energy production, and
     increase the proportion of renewable energy that supplies
     electricity to American consumers, the best thing the federal
     government can do is reduce or remove regulatory obstacles to
     energy entrepreneurship and innovation. If renewable energies are
     to capture a sizable share of the energy market, what they need,
     more than anything else, is regulatory room to compete.

References

   1. 
http://energy.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Mjg1YWVjNDZjZTBkNDhlODUzZjVkZThmM2U0YjAwNjE=
   2. http://energy.nationalreview.com/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to