Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Anonymous Electronic Reactions by Students:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_30-2007_10_06.shtml#1191619037
Some of us at UCLA Law School have been experimenting with a new
student participation system: Students in our classes have been issued
what we call "clickers" -- electronic devices a little larger than a
pocket calculator -- on which they can anonymously respond to
professors' questions. When I start the corresponding program on the
in-class computer, I can pose students' questions, and then get their
reactions. The system, I'm told, can be used for many purposes, but
right now I'm mainly using it to (1) quiz students to make sure they
understand the legal rules, using questions that do have a right
answer, and (2) ask students' views about policy questions.
Just today, I had a particularly interesting experience that I doubt I
would have had without the clickers. My criminal law class is covering
the law of rape, and we were talking about State v. Alston, a
controversial 1984 North Carolina case involving the question of how
much evidence of force is needed to prove rape. We discussed the facts
(as reported in the appellate decision) in considerable detail, and
discussed the court's legal ruling.
But I then asked the students to imagine themselves as jurors, and to
answer whether -- given the facts -- they would have found the
defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of forcible rape (as the
jury in Alston did, though the appellate court reversed). I also asked
women and men to give separate answers (women A and B for proven
beyond a reasonable doubt / not proven, men C and D for proven / not
proven); and note that the answers are all anonymous.
Sixty students answered, out of a class of 81 (of whom I imagine 70 to
75 were present). This included 25 of 41 women and 35 of 40 men, a
higher rate of abstention -- or absence -- on women's part, but a high
participation rate for both sexes. The answers were:
* Among women: 10 voted for rape proven beyond a reasonable doubt,
15 not proven.
* Among men: 17 voted for rape proven, 18 not proven.
I stressed to students, of course, that this was not a large sample,
and most certainly not one representative of the country as a whole.
But I think it ended up being a useful perspective for the students,
in highlighting to everyone both (1) how close the division was, and
(2) how little gender gap there was (with men actually being a little
more likely than women to find rape proven beyond a reasonable doubt,
but I'm not sure not to any statistically significant degree). My
sense is that this was an important pedagogical tool, chiefly because
it helped show people how people of their own age, sex, and social
class can disagree on such matters (whether or not they conclude that
such disagreement is indeed warranted).
As importantly, I doubt that I'd have gotten nearly as much response,
or as candid a reaction, if I'd just asked for a show of hands instead
of an anonymous clicker vote. And even if I had gotten candid
responses, I doubt that students would have had confidence in that
candor. So I was very pleased with how the clickers worked here.
_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh
