Posted by Orin Kerr:
Vermeule on Emergency Lawmaking:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_10_14-2007_10_20.shtml#1192550784


   Adrian Vermeule has posted a very interesting essay on SSRN:
   [1]Emergency Lawmaking After 9/11 and 7/7. The argument:

     This essay offers case studies of three emergency statutes, all
     dealing with terrorism and all enacted within less than a year
     after a major terrorist attack: the September 14, 2001
     Authorization to Use Military Force; the USA PATRIOT Act; and the
     U.K. Terrorism Act 2006. A standard worry about such cases is that
     the circumstances of emergency lawmaking produce blank-check
     delegations to the executive. The fog of uncertainty, emotions such
     as urgency and visceral fear, and the tendency of legislators and
     the public to rally 'round the flag, all cause legislators to vote
     the executive massive new powers, regardless of whether those
     powers are rationally justifiable. This view is descriptively and
     theoretically flawed. Descriptively, executives in all three
     episodes lost control of the political dynamics, faced bipartisan
     resistance or rebellion in the legislature, and ended up obtaining
     far less than they asked for or desired. Theoretically, emergency
     conditions have cross-cutting political effects on legislators. The
     mechanisms and forces operative during emergency lawmaking cut both
     ways, constraining as well as empowering the executive, with
     unpredictable net results in particular cases. Although executives
     usually receive new powers in emergencies, there is no reason to
     think that they systematically tend to receive more new authority
     than a rational legislature would provide.

     I think that's plausible, and seems correct to me in the case of the
   Patriot Act in particular.
     There's also a second-order dynamic here: Emergency legislation
   creates fear of overreaching that often leads to later legislation
   tempering the more controversial aspects of the emergency legislation.
   For example, the Patriot Act renewal legislation in 2006 added privacy
   protections to counter fears of certain provisions of the Patriot Act.
   And right now, Congress is considering legislation adding protections
   to counter fears of certain provisions enacted by the Protect America
   Act of 2007 (the FISA legislation pass a few months ago).
     Thanks to [2]Larry Solum for the link.

References

   1. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1019542
   2. http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to