Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Five "Myths" About Rendition:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_10_21-2007_10_27.shtml#1192975531


   Former Clinton Adminsitration National Security Council staff member
   Daniel Benjamin takes to the Washington Post's Outlook section to
   address [1]"5 Myths about Rendition (and that New Movie)." Writes
   Benjamin:

     With hearings in Congress, legal cases bouncing up to the Supreme
     Court and complaints from Canada and our European allies, the issue
     of rendition is everywhere. There's even a new, [2]eponymously
     titled movie in a theater near you, starring Reese Witherspoon as a
     bereft wife whose innocent husband gets kidnapped and Meryl Streep
     as the frosty CIA chief who ordered the snatch. Like most covert
     actions and much of the war on al-Qaeda, the practice is shrouded
     in mystery -- and, increasingly, the suspicion that it's synonymous
     with torture and lawlessness.

     In fact, the term "rendition" in the counterterrorism context means
     nothing more than moving someone from one country to another,
     outside the formal process of extradition. For the CIA, rendition
     has become a key tool for getting terrorists from places where
     they're causing trouble to places where they can't. The problem is
     where these people are taken and what happens to them when they get
     there. As a former director for counterterrorism policy on the
     National Security Council staff, I've been involved with the issue
     of rendition for nearly a decade -- and some of the myths
     surrounding it need to be cleared up.

   Here are Benjamin's five "myths":

     1. Rendition is something the Bush administration cooked up. 2.
     People who are "rendered" inevitably end up in a foreign slammer --
     or worse. 3. Step one of a rendition involves kidnapping the
     suspect. 4. Rendition is just a euphemism for outsourcing torture.
     5. Pretty much anyone -- including U.S. citizens and green card
     holders -- can be rendered these days.

References

   1. 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/19/AR2007101900835_pf.html
   2. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0804522/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to