Posted by Ilya Somin:
Calabresi-Melamed and Bernard Malamud:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_12_23-2007_12_29.shtml#1198546054


   With the possible exception of attending committee meetings, grading
   final exams is the most boring part of a professor's job; that - plus
   recovering from ankle surgery- is what I have been doing the last few
   days. Tis definitely the season to be jolly.

   Every once in a while, however, the monotony is broken by a hilarious
   exam blooper. In my Property class, I always cover [1]the
   Calabresi-Melamed framework which distinguishes property rules,
   liability rules and inalienability rules.

   This year, the students seem to have grasped it well. However, I did
   read one exam that repeatedly referred to "the Bernard Melamud"
   theory. After some confuision, I figured out that the student must
   have confused Calabresi and Melamed with Nobel Prize-winning novelist
   [2]Bernard Malamud. Malamud did write some books where legal issues
   feature prominently; his most famous novel, [3]The Fixer, is a
   fictionalized account of [4]the trial of Mendel Beilis, a famous
   anti-Semitic "blood libel" case in czarist Russia. Unfortunately,
   however, Malamud - unlike [5]Jane Austen - didn't focus much on
   property law and wasn't much of a law and economics scholar.

   It's a minor mistake by the student and one that I didn't penalize
   much; but humorous nonetheless.

References

   1. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_Rules,_Liability_Rules_and_Inalienability:_One_View_of_the_Cathedral
   2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Malamud
   3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fixer_%28Malamud_novel%29
   4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beilis_trial
   5. http://volokh.com/posts/1197354521.shtml

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to