Posted by Ilya Somin:
Dinesh D'Souza on Atheism and Libertarianism:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_12_23-2007_12_29.shtml#1198571058


   There is no shortage of poorly informed rants against libertarianism;
   similarly, it's easy to find silly screeds against atheism. Dinesh
   D'Souza, however, has achieved the unusual distinction of combining
   these two art forms in[1] a single column. Let's start with the part
   about libertarians:

     Many libertarians are basically conservatives who are either gay or
     druggies or people who generally find the conservative moral agenda
     too restrictive. So they flee from the conservative to the
     libertarian camp where much wider parameters of personal behavior
     are embraced.

   It is true that most libertarians oppose parts of "the conservative
   moral agenda" (at least to the extent that that agenda is to be
   enforced by the state). The rest of the above is hogwash. The vast
   majority of libertarians are neither gay, nor "druggies," nor even
   people with unusual personal lives of any kind. And there are very few
   libertarians who have "fled" from conservatism, because most
   libertarians were never conservative to begin with. There are many
   prominent libertarian thinkers who are former liberals or socialists,
   such as Hayek, Friedman, Richard Epstein, and quite a few others. Very
   few if any were former conservatives of any kind - much less ones who
   fled because they were gay or wanted to use drugs. To top it off,
   D'Souza also commits the common mistake of conflating libertarian
   opposition to state regulation of "personal behavior" with "embracing"
   such behavior (an error also committed by more sophisticated
   conservative critics of libertarianism, such as [2]Kay Hymowitz).

   The anti-atheist part of D'Souza's screed is even sillier. He starts
   of by suggesting that Christopher Hitchens' fondness for alcohol is
   somehow related to his atheism (as if there aren't plenty of theists
   who drink to excess). He ends with this:

     I agree that many nominal Christians have also forgotten the
     message of Christmas. Even so I wonder: what's the atheist
     equivalent of Christmas? Darwin's birthday? For many libertarians I
     suppose it's the day they get their tax refunds.

   Here, D'Souza makes the common but foolish mistake of conflating
   atheism with the theory of evolution. In reality, you can be an
   atheist and reject that theory (as the Soviet Union to a large extent
   did under Stalin) or be a theist and accept it (as the Catholic Church
   now does). As [3]Radley Balko points out, D'Souza is seriously
   misinformed if he thinks that libertarians celebrate tax refunds as
   opposed to decrying them as a part of the government's deceptive
   scheme to extract what are effectively coercive interest-free loans
   from the taxpayers.

   As for the atheist equivalent of Christmas, atheists no more need an
   equivalent of Christmas than we need an equivalent of Ramadan or Yom
   Kippur. Part of the point of atheism is that we do not believe in the
   need for holidays that honor deities. Obviously, there are individual
   atheists who celebrate some theistic holidays for cultural or family
   reasons or just to have a good time. But atheism as such has no need
   for "equivalents" of religious holidays. Indeed, since [4]atheism is
   not a comprehensive belief system but merely a rejection of the
   existence of God, it has no need of any holidays at all. Rather,
   individual atheists will choose to celebrate particular holidays for
   ethnic, historical, or philosophical reasons that have no connection
   to atheism itself. Just as atheism is compatible with a variety of
   different moral and political views, it is also compatible with a
   variety of different holidays.

   There once was a time when Dinesh D'Souza was a reasonably serious
   public intellectual. I didn't always agree with him then, but his
   writings were at least worth serious consideration. This column,
   coming on the heels of [5]his book arguing that we should sacrifice
   many of our freedoms in order to allay the anger of reactionary
   Muslims, suggests that those days are gone. There are weighty
   arguments to be made against both libertarianism and atheism. Sadly,
   Dinesh D'Souza is no longer likely to be the one to make them.

References

   1. 
http://news.aol.com/newsbloggers/2007/12/21/how-atheists-celebrate-christmas/
   2. http://volokh.com/posts/1189661948.shtml
   3. http://www.theagitator.com/2007/12/22/dinesh/
   4. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_12_10-2006_12_16.shtml#1166158108
   5. http://www.amazon.com/Enemy-At-Home-Cultural-Responsibility/dp/0385510128

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to