Posted by Orin Kerr:
Methods of Execution in France, 1792 to 1981:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_12_30-2008_01_05.shtml#1199309689


   Sorry for the gruesome subject matter, but [1]my post on foreign law
   and methods of execution brings to mind the practices used in the
   favored country among those Justices who favor looking to foreign law:
   France, or as Justice Breyer would put it, La République Française.
     [2]Wikipedia has a fascinating history of methods of execution in
   France. It seems that from 1792 to 1981, when [3]France abolished
   capital punishment, the only allowed method of execution was the
   Guillotine. The Guillotine was originally designed in the late 18th
   Century to be a more humane method of execution: the idea was that it
   would be fast, painless, and certain.

     The basis for the machine's success was the belief that it was a
     humane form of execution, contrasting with the methods used in
     pre-revolutionary, ancien régime (former regime) France. In
     France, before the guillotine, members of the nobility were
     beheaded with a sword or axe, while commoners were usually hanged,
     a form of death that could take minutes or longer - other more
     gruesome methods of executions were also used, such as the wheel,
     burning at the stake, etc. In the case of decapitation, it also
     sometimes took repeated blows to sever the head completely. The
     condemned or the family of the condemned would sometimes pay the
     executioner to ensure that the blade was sharp in order to provide
     for a quick and relatively painless death.

     However, it seems that the use of the Guillotine was plagued by
   concerns that it was not as swift and painless as it was designed to
   be. Critics argued that in fact those executed by the Guillotine
   suffered greatly in the seconds after the blade fell:

     From its first use, there has been debate as to whether the
     guillotine always provided as swift a death as Dr Guillotin hoped.
     . . . . [in light of] the possibility that the very swiftness of
     the guillotine only prolonged the victim's suffering. The blade
     cuts quickly enough so that there is relatively little impact on
     the brain case, and perhaps less likelihood of immediate
     unconsciousness than with a more violent decapitation, or long-drop
     hanging.
     Audiences to guillotinings told numerous stories of blinking
     eyelids, moving eyes, movement of the mouth, even an expression of
     "unequivocal indignation" on the face of the decapitated Charlotte
     Corday when her cheek was slapped. Anatomists and other scientists
     in several countries have tried to perform more definitive
     experiments on severed human heads as recently as 1956. Inevitably
     the evidence is only anecdotal. What appears to be a head
     responding to the sound of its name, or to the pain of a pinprick,
     may be only random muscle twitching or automatic reflex action,
     with no awareness involved. At worst, it seems that the massive
     drop in cerebral blood pressure would cause a victim to lose
     consciousness in several seconds.

   Anyway, that's Wikipedia's take; I don't know how accurate it is.

References

   1. http://volokh.com/posts/1190749819.shtml
   2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillotine
   3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_France

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to