Posted by Eugene Volokh:
North Carolina Appellate Court, Lesbians, and the "Psychological Parent" 
Doctrine:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_05_04-2008_05_10.shtml#1210199036


   [1]Mason v. Dwinnell, decided yesterday, upheld a trial court's
   decision that awarded joint custody of a child to the biological
   mother (Dwinnell) and the mother's lesbian ex-partner (Mason). The
   child had been conceived when Mason and Dwinnell were a couple, and
   was raised by Mason and Dwinnell together until the two broke up when
   the child was four; the two had then, by mutual agreement, had joint
   custody until the child was seven.

   The court stressed that "[a]lthough this appeal arises in the context
   of a same-sex domestic partnership, it involves only the
   constitutional standards applicable to all custody disputes between
   legal parents and third parties." And the court reasoned -- applying
   what looks like the "psychological parent" doctrine that quite a few
   courts have applied in recent years -- that because Dwinnell
   voluntarily let Mason help raise the child for several years, and let
   the child treat Mason as a parent, Dwinnell voluntarily surrendered
   her constitutional right to exclusive control over the child. The
   proper standard was thus the "best interests" standard applicable to
   disputes between parents; and the trial court's decision that joint
   custody was in the child's best interests was not an abuse of
   discretion.

   I haven't thought much about the psychological parent doctrine, but
   I'm inclined to think that it is sound. And if it's sound in general
   -- for instance, when the psychological parent is a stepparent who
   raised the child from infancy (with the other biological parent out of
   the picture) -- then it's equally sound for same-sex relationships.
   Whatever one might say about whether in the abstract it's better for a
   child to be raised by a woman and a man or by two women, a child who
   has formed deep emotional bonds with two women deserves the same
   protection for those bonds as does a child who has formed such bonds
   with a woman and a man.

References

   1. http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/coa/opinions/2008/070176-1.htm

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to