Posted by David Post:
For the "This Really Burns Me Up" File:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_05_04-2008_05_10.shtml#1210344080


   The State of Oregon, bless its heart, has begun sending out
   cease-and-desist letters to websites like Justia and
   Public.Resource.Org, demanding that the sites take down copies of the
   Oregon Revised Statutes posted there on the grounds that the posting
   infringes the State's copyright in the statutes.

   Hard to believe, but apparently true. [See [1]Cory Doctorow's posting
   on Boing Boing, and the [2]story from TechDirt, along with
   accompanying documents.

   The copyright claim is (like a lot of copyright claims these days)
   probably about 98% horse manure. They're not asserting copyright in
   the text of the laws themselves, but in the "arrangement and subject
   matter compilation," the numbering of statutory sections, and the
   various "tables, indices, and annotations" contained in the documents.
   Lots of that stuff is simply not copyrightable -- and even as to the
   stuff in which there might be copyright protection, what makes the
   State of Oregon so sure that it, and not the various individuals who
   authored particular sections, owns the copyright to those
   contributions?

   But that's not what burns me up, of course. What burns me up is that
   the State of Oregon would choose to assert its rather fanciful
   copyright claim for the purpose of making public access to the
   authoritative version of its laws more, rather than less, difficult.
   It is completely outrageous that in 2008 we do not have a complete and
   authoritative compendium of all of the laws of the 50 States, and the
   federal government, available at no cost on the net. Oh, did I mention
   that Thomson-West Publishing publishes and sells the Oregon Revised
   Statutes (and makes it available, for a fee, over its Westlaw
   service)? My colleague Peter Martin, of the Cornell [3]Legal
   Information Institute, has been working on this problem for years and
   years, and has made some, but far too little, headway -- though I hope
   he keeps fighting the good fight on this front.

   [Thanks to George Byrd for the pointer to this story]

References

   1. http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/15/oregon-our-laws-are.html
   2. http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080416/133815864.shtml
   3. http://www.law.cornell.edu/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to