Posted by Jim Lindgren:
CNBC stock contest: Is winning a weekly prize worse than losing?
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_05_04-2008_05_10.shtml#1210466929


   If it�s late spring, it�s time once again for the CNBC stock trading
   challenge. First prize is $500,000 and the runner-up wins $250,000.
   Even after taxes, that's a lot of money.

   But the non-cash weekly prizes carry such a hefty income tax liability
   that I don�t think I�d want to win most of them.

   If you are in a combined 37% federal and state income tax marginal tax
   bracket, in week 8 you could win 2 nights in a Bentley (with
   chauffeur) and pay only $3,700 in income taxes on a prize that retails
   for $10,000. Because I could rent an ordinary luxury car without a
   chaffeur for a couple nights for a few hundred dollars, something I'm
   not inclined to do in any event, I can't imagine why I'd want to rent
   a Bentley for a couple thousand dollars, the amount of taxes I would
   have to pay if I won a free prize.

   Or you could win week 4�s prize of a private jet to Jamaica for a
   3-night vacation for only $12,000 in taxes. Because one can be a guest
   in many of the world�s best hotels for under a $1,000 a night,
   spending $12,000 on a three-night vacation seems like a lot to spend
   for a �free� vacation � one that comes complete with a 1099 showing
   income of $32,500.

   What do families do when they win a new house on Extreme Makeover:
   Home Edition? The producers of that show must pay a mint to build a
   house in a week; I wonder how generously those houses are valued on
   1099s.

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to