Posted by David Bernstein:
Recent Scientific Evidence News:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_08_10-2008_08_16.shtml#1218659902


   (1) The New York Times[1] has a piece discussing the problems with
   adversarial expert testimony in the U.S., and promoting the Australian
   system of "hottubbing" as an alternative. I'm skeptical that this less
   adversarial approach will catch in the U.S.; despite it's long-term
   failure so far, I still think that finding a way to use nonadversarial
   experts (agreed to by the parties or if necessary appointed by the
   courts) is the way to go. Indeed, the Times doesn't mention it, but
   Australia (or maybe it's just some Australian jurisdictions) also is
   adopting a system requiring the parties in civil litigation to agree
   on a slate of experts.

   (2) Balko and Koppl discuss sound ideas for reforming forensic science
   [2]in Slate.

   (3) ABC News has an [3]extremely irresponsible report on families that
   fled Love Canal three decades ago. Apparently, and in contrast to
   previous studies, a new report forthcoming from the N.Y. Department of
   Health finds some elevated health risks among the evacuees and their
   children. But since the report hasn't been released, and the
   Department of Health declines comment, there is no way to evaluate it.
   Meanwhile, ABC repeats every unsubstantiated, and in some cases
   rebutted by earlier studies, claim about health problems among Love
   Canal evacuees.

   (4) This isn't really news, but if the above topics interest you, you
   will undoubtedly want to download my recently published article in the
   Iowa Law Review, [4]Expert Witnesses, Adversarial Bias, and the
   (Partial) Failure of the Daubert Revolution.

References

   1. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/12/us/12experts.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
   2. http://www.slate.com/id/2197284/
   3. http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=5553393&page=1
   4. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=963461

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to