Posted by Ilya Somin:
Three Positive Aspects of Obama's Victory:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_11_02-2008_11_08.shtml#1225861213


   For a variety of reasons, I oppose most of Barack Obama's policy
   agenda and therefore do not welcome his victory. At this moment,
   however, I think it appropriate to note what I see as three important
   positives that will result from his triumph.

   First and foremost, Obama's victory is an extraordinary milestone in
   the history of American race relations. Anyone with even slight
   familiarity with our history of racial oppression can hardly fail to
   recognize what an important historical moment the election of the
   first African-American president is. As a constitutional law
   professor, I have probably spent more time considering that history
   than most. The history of American constitutional law is to an
   important extent the history of racist repression and the long
   struggle to overcome it. As recently as 45 years ago, most American
   blacks did not even have the right to vote, much less any hope of
   being elected to the highest office in the land. Just a few decades
   before that, in the early 1900s, many southern blacks could not even
   freely change residences or employers, because of constraints imposed
   by state peonage laws, about which co-blogger David Bernstein and I
   have written in some of our academic work. David, of course, is far
   more of an expert on the history of racist law than I am, and I am
   more than happy to agree with what he says in [1]his most recent post.

   Obama's victory will not eliminate the vestiges of racism that remain,
   nor will it solve the problems of the black underclass. But it is an
   important symbolic moment, and it should help to alleviate racial
   tensions.

   Second, it is clear that Obama's win will improve the image of the
   United States throughout much of the world. I do not believe that
   pleasing foreign public opinion should be the be all and end all of
   American foreign policy. Sometimes, we can and should take unpopular
   actions. But it would be wrong to assume, as some conservatives have
   during the Bush Administration, that the good will of foreign publics
   is irrelevant. Most of our key allies are democracies whose
   governments are to some degree constrained by public opinion. If that
   opinion is more favorable to us, it will make our foreign policy
   objectives easier to achieve because allied governments will be more
   inclined to cooperate with us.

   Finally, Obama is an incredibly talented and charismatic politician.
   His meteoric rise from being a little-known state senator just four
   years ago is the most rapid ascent from obscurity to the White House
   in at least a century, if not longer. Conservatives and libertarians
   underestimate his competence and political skills at their peril. Just
   ask his defeated opponents, including Hillary Clinton.

   Obama's competence and charisma is of course a double-edged sword.
   Political competence used in the service of a harmful big government
   agenda could actually make things worse than they would be under a
   less skillfull leader. For this reason, I cannot be as enthusiastic
   about Obama's potential for "greatness" as [2]co-blogger David Post.

   However, it is fair to say that Obama is unlikely to commit serious
   mistakes merely because of incompetence or stupidity. If he adopts
   flawed policies, it will be because of his ideology or because of
   perverse political incentives that enable him and his party to reap
   short-term political gains from policies that cause long-run harm. The
   latter temptation, of course, is far from unique to Obama or the
   Democrats, as we have had occasion to learn during the years of the
   Bush Administration. If Obama's election achieves nothing else
   positive, it can at least help us get to the point where the election
   of a black president will be viewed as normal, and that president
   himself judged by the same standards as those applied to other
   politicians.

References

   1. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_11_02-2008_11_08.shtml#1225859887
   2. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_11_02-2008_11_08.shtml#1225640290

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to