Posted by Eugene Volokh:
"Stocks Fall as Investors Ponder Obama Presidency,"
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_11_02-2008_11_08.shtml#1225920952


   reports an [1]AP headline. But wait: Even if Obama's election would be
   worse for the economy (or even just the stock market) than McCain's --
   something that I do believe -- surely the Obama victory can't have
   been much of a surprise to investors. Presumably they incorporated
   this likelihood into the value they were already putting on stocks,
   and while I suppose there is a difference between 100% knowledge and
   80-90% prediction, would it really be that much of a difference?

   All of which, it seems to me, leads me to ask: How does the AP, or its
   sources, actually know that the stocks fell because of "post-election
   nerves ... as investors began questioning what impact a Barack Obama
   presidency will have on business and the overall economy"?

References

   1. http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gHs5OM3gFG_DytQQZFbWfgPT08MAD948TQA00

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to