Posted by Randy Barnett:
Some Good Things About This Result:  
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_11_02-2008_11_08.shtml#1225926727


   I was not a supporter of Barack Obama. I did not hope he would win
   yesterday's election, and I am not looking forward to the short of
   "change" I believe he has in mind. I hope I am wrong, but I think some
   really bad stuff is going to happen as a result of Democratic control
   of the Presidency and Congress. But regardless of how much bad stuff
   happens in the future, three really good things happened yesterday
   that deserve note.
   The first and by far the most important is the election of the first
   African-American as President. I won't spend as much time as my
   co-bloggers David and Ilya did in their posts last night, but I
   whole-heartedly endorse their analysis. It is only because we have
   made so much progress on the issue of race in this country that we can
   afford to glide over the enormous significance of the event that this
   progress made possible. African Americans were kept as slaves for over
   150 years, followed by a brief period of liberty that was snuffed out
   by an organized campaign of rampant and cruel terrorism that
   culminated in 100 years of racial apartheid. I am old enough to
   remember what pervasive social prejudice against blacks looked and
   felt like. It matters more how Barack Obama was elected than the fact
   he was elected. Barack Obama's election in a campaign in which his
   race worked in his favor, and no palpable racial opposition emerged,
   is amazing to behold just 50 years or so after the formal end of Jim
   Crow. Until yesterday, there were millions of good hearted Americans
   who felt like marginal citizens in the land of their and their
   ancestors' birth. Barack Obama was not nominated to high office by a
   benign President, as were Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas. He
   was elected President by a majority of the American electorate. No
   matter what racism survives and racial politics continue--and continue
   it will--the felt relationship of African-Americans to the United
   States irrevocably changed yesterday. The same would be true with the
   election of a Jewish president, but to a much lesser extent
   because--despite the virulent antisemitism that has existed here--many
   American Jews consider the U.S. to be their Promised Land; an attitude
   that the history of African Americans makes all but impossible for
   them. I urge those readers who believe that the forthcoming Obama
   administration poses a genuine danger to liberty, as I do, to pause
   for a moment and savor the importance to the American story of what
   took place yesterday. This gain cannot be gainsaid.
   Second, Barack Obama's election yesterday represents the end of the
   Bush-Clinton lock on the Republican and Democratic parties, which is a
   very good thing for both parties. Whatever his accomplishments--and I
   credit him for policies that kept American soil free of terrorist
   attack since 9/11--George W. Bush's Presidency was bad for the cause
   of liberty and for the Republican party. I won't enumerate all the
   reasons why since they are legion and obvious. I want to focus instead
   on the end of Clintonism in the Democratic Party. Without Obama, there
   would be Hillary and Bill for years to come, and it is good riddance
   to both. Family dynasties--including the Adams father and son--are not
   befitting a Republic, except the banana kind. True, President Obama's
   policies as President will likely be far worse than Bill Clinton's,
   though the good parts of the Clinton Administration happened after the
   Republicans took control of Congress. Regardless of whether that
   happens again, or whether Obama is a worse President than Hillary
   would have been (which is likely), finally ridding us of the 20-year
   Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton cage match was a second good thing that
   happened yesterday.
   Third, John McCain will not be President of the United States. Denying
   the ultimate political reward to a politician who was so principally
   responsible for gutting the freedom of political speech, and
   continuing the assault on the electoral process that was begun after
   Watergate, is justice. Even many of those who preferred McCain to
   Obama would acknowledge that McCain would have done many of the same
   bad things as President they fear Obama will do. When this happened,
   Republican opposition would be divided and muted, and responsibility
   for the bad effects of these policies would necessarily have been
   shared by both parties. The election of a Democratic President, Senate
   and House will place responsibility for the coming "change" squarely
   where it belongs. A whole generation of Americans have yet to
   experience the joys of one-party Democratic rule. I sincerely hope
   that this experience will be better than I expect it to be. I want
   only the best for this country. But if it doesn't, then Americans will
   know who to blame in a way they would not if John McCain were
   President. Now is not the time to discuss all the ways that this
   responsibility will be deflected or denied. The point is that this
   will be much more difficult than it would have been with John McCain
   as President. (Of course, I would have made the opposite claim has
   McCain been elected: At least Barack Obama will not be President of
   the United States.)
   One final thought. In the discussion that has already begun about how
   the Republican Party needs to change to adjust to this election
   result, one consideration is overlooked. Much will depend on exactly
   what the Democrats attempt, accomplish, and the results thereof. These
   cannot be reliably foretold in advance and are less clear today than
   they ever will be again. If the Democratic Party forthrightly assumes
   the mantle of the Party of Government, this will present an obvious
   political opportunity for the creation of a Party of Liberty in
   opposition. Not that I am predicting this. I am just saying that it
   would be in the political interest of Republicans to become that
   party, which makes it somewhat more likely that they might do so if a
   critical mass of Republican activists and leaders can point the way.
   I do not believe in historical inevitability. Whatever opportunities
   may be created for Republicans will not automatically be recognized
   and seized by them. My only point is that we cannot know today the
   exact nature of these opportunities because we do not know exactly
   what the Democrats will do next and how. The point of this post,
   however, is that no matter what may happen in the future, three good
   things happened last night.

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to