Posted by Ilya Somin:
The Case for Accepting Obama's Nomination of Eric Holder for Attorney General:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_11_16-2008_11_22.shtml#1227131064


   Like [1]co-blogger Orin Kerr, I tend to believe that Republicans
   shouldn't fight the confirmation of Eric Holder, Obama's nominee for
   attorney general. Most of the objections to Holder articulated by
   [2]the National Review and other conservatives seem to be ideological
   in nature. I too believe that Holder is wrong on many issues. But that
   is not enough reason to justify opposing his nomination.

   In the past, I have [3]argued that senators can legitimately consider
   ideology in deciding whether or not to support presidential judicial
   nominees. Executive branch nominations, however, are a different
   matter. Federal judges are not the president's subordinates. They
   belong to an independent branch of government. The president isn't
   entitled to a judiciary that defers to his preferences. By contrast,
   cabinet officers and other executive officials are supposed to follow
   the president's policies and take his orders. Therefore, it is
   important that the president be able to choose people who share his
   policy priorities. Conservative advocates of the [4]unitary executive
   should be among the first to appreciate the importance of allowing the
   president to choose his own top advisers. Realistically, any attorney
   general nominated by Obama will likely be a liberal Democrat; after
   all, that is what Obama is himself.

   Senators might still be justified in rejecting a cabinet nominee if he
   were clearly unqualified for the job, showed evidence of serious moral
   depravity, or had ideological proclivities that are dangerously far
   removed from the mainstream. I don't think Holder qualifies on any of
   these counts. He is obviously qualified for the job, and seems to be a
   fairly conventional left-wing Democrat. I'm not a fan of his apparent
   role in President Clinton's pardons of Marc Rich and others; but as
   far as I know there is no evidence that Holder did anything illegal or
   seriously unethical in these cases.

   Holder would not be my choice for AG. But he is an unsurprising choice
   for a liberal Democratic administration, and his flaws are nowhere
   near serious enough to justify setting aside the president's
   prerogative to choose his own cabinet personnel.

References

   1. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_11_16-2008_11_22.shtml#1227121128
   2. 
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmM1OGM4OGRiNTI5NTIzOTFkMDAwMTJiNGFlYWFiZGI=
   3. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_05_13-2007_05_19.shtml#1179281659
   4. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_08_12-2007_08_18.shtml#1187118574

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to