Posted by David Post:
Patenting Patent Trolling:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_11_30-2008_12_06.shtml#1228428426


   As many of you know, "patent trolls" are parties that buy up issued
   patents for the sole purpose of using the patents offensively to
   collect licensing fees (or, failing that, to sue for infringement)
   from 3d parties. There's been lots of writing about the phenomenon
   over the past several years and about what it says about the (sorry)
   state of our current patent system.

   In a new wrinkle, it appears that Halliburton, Inc., has filed a
   patent application claiming a patent for the process of patent
   trolling! Pretty cheeky!! 

   Here's the [1]actual application at the PTO website. According to the
   WSJ law blog, Halliburton claims that it does not intend to "apply the
   technique offensively" -- i.e., it's not trying to monopolize the
   business of patent trolling -- but rather it "intends to use any
   patent that may issue from this application defensively to discourage
   entities that engage in such tactics."

   There is, incidentally, approximately 0% chance that the patent will
   be granted. For one thing, it's very hard to see how Halliburton would
   establish that is has come up with a "novel" process (as required for
   the issuance of a patent), and in any event, the recent decision by
   the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in In re Bilski almost certainly
   renders inventions like this one (and other "business method" patents
   the PTO has been handing out in recent years) unpatentable. [In
   Bilski, the court held that a process is "patent-eligible" if "(1) it
   is tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or (2) it transforms a
   particular article into a different state or thing." Hard to see how
   patent trolling methods fit the bill . . .

   [More commentary on this patent filing is here at [2]madisonian.net
   and [3]patently-o]

References

   Visible links
   1. 
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=20080270152&OS=20080270152&RS=20080270152
   2. 
http://madisonian.net/2008/11/09/attorney-tries-to-patent-form-of-patent-trolling/
   3. http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/junk-patents.html

   Hidden links:
   4. file://localhost/files/110608_1711_JunkPatents1.png

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to