Posted by Ilya Somin:
The 75th Anniversary of Stalin's Terror Famine and the Genocide-Mass Murder 
Distinction:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_12_07-2008_12_13.shtml#1228688987


   Cathy Young, fellow Russian emigre, has[1] a fascinating article on
   the 75th anniversary of Stalin's terror famine of the 1930s. Some 6 to
   10 million peasants were deliberately starved to death by the Soviet
   government as part of its campaign to force the peasantry to accept
   the collectivization of agriculture.

   Unfortunately, as Young points out, proper commemoration and public
   understanding of this horrendous atrocity has been partially
   forestalled by an ongoing dispute between the Russia and Ukrainian
   governments. The Ukrainians claim that this case of mass murder
   amounts to "genocide" because Stalin deliberately targeted Ukrainian
   peasants in order to prevent any possible resurgence of Ukrainian
   nationalism. The Russian government notes that many of the victims
   were members of other ethnic groups (including millions of ethnic
   Russians), and therefore argue that there was no genocide, but
   "merely" a mass murder.

   Despite the current Putin government's efforts to minimize the scope
   of Soviet atrocities and play up the supposed positive aspects of the
   communist era, the Russians do not deny that millions of people were
   deliberately starved to death during the collectivization campaign.
   Instead, they focus on denying the "genocide" charge. As Young puts
   it, "it seems that the only time Russia's government remembers the
   Russian victims of the Terror-Famine is when it needs them to counter
   Ukrainian claims [of genocide]."

   The ridiculous nature of this dispute highlights the arbitrariness of
   distinguishing between genocide and "mere" mass murder, and of holding
   that the former is somehow far worse than the latter. I have written
   about the issue before in [2]this series of posts.

   To the millions of peasants who died in the terror famine, it hardly
   matters whether they were targeted on ethnic grounds or merely because
   they were "class enemies" and "kulaks" who were considered obstacles
   to Stalin's plans. Moreover, given that Kulak and class enemy status
   was largely determined by family background (and both were defined
   broadly enough to include virtually all peasants whose families owned
   even a small plot of land), one cannot even make the claim that a
   genocide targets people for characteristics they cannot change, while
   more traditional communist mass murders target people based on mutable
   attributes.

   On a more personal note, I recently discussed this dispute with my
   grandmother, who actually lived through the famine in early 1930s
   Ukraine (though she is not Ukrainian). She reacted with incredulity.
   "How can anyone doubt there was a genocide," she said, "I saw the
   starving and dying people myself!" I tried to explain to her [3]the
   genocide-mass murder distinction embedded in current international law
   as neutrally as I could, noting some of the justifications offered for
   it. She, of course, was unmoved, and continued to see the distinction
   as a dubious contrivance. I have to agree.

References

   1. 
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/861rmjep.asp
   2. http://volokh.com/posts/chain_1192579509.shtml
   3. http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext.htm

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to