Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Bush Administration Imperils Last of the Legislative Vetoes:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_12_07-2008_12_13.shtml#1228768665


   Last week, the Bureau of Land Management [1]announced the repeal of a
   regulation that required the emergency suspension of mining on BLM
   lands. The Center for Biological Diversity [2]immediately decried this
   "last-minute attempt to roll back environmental regulations." The CBD
   and other environmental groups [3]had filed suit to enforce the
   regulation so as to prevent uranium mining near the Grand Canyon.

   On the surface, this action would seem to fit a familiar narrative
   about the Bush Administration's last-minute efforts to relax
   environmental regulations for industry's benefit. Digging a bit deeper
   reveals something more. The BLM's move may please the mining industry,
   but it also eliminates a deeply troubling -- and almost certainly
   unconstitutional -- regulation from the books.

   The regulation allowed one of two Congressional committees to force
   the BLM to alter the treatment of designated federal lands when either
   committee determined there were "emergency" circumstances. In effect,
   a single Congressional committee could, acting alone, overrule
   administrative action and alter the legal status of existing mining
   claims. If a unicameral legislative veto is unconstitutional, as the
   Supreme Court held in [4]INS v. Chadha, then a unilateral
   congressional committee veto is clearly out of bounds as well.

   Interestingly enough, the regulation had been on the books for quite
   some time. While its constitutionality had been challenged, it had
   escaped judicial largely because the few courts that looked at it were
   able to avoid confronting the provision head on. In any event, were a
   court to consider it now -- perhaps in the CBD's challenge to the
   uranium mine mentioned above -- I don't think there's much question it
   would agree with the Bush Administration that this regulation had to
   go.

References

   1. http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/info/newsroom/2008/december/NR_12_04_2008.html
   2. 
http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2008/uranium-exploration-12-04-2008.html
   3. 
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/05/us/05withdraw.html?partner=permalink&exprod=permalink
   4. http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_80_1832/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to