Posted by Jim Lindgren:
Interpreting the Obama Team's Press Release.
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_12_14-2008_12_20.shtml#1229386028


   As he promised, Barack Obama had his staff prepare a report of
   contacts between his staff and the office of Governor Blagojevich. And
   it was ready for release in a timely fashion when the U.S. attorney's
   office asked that the report's release be delayed for a week.

   Dan Pfeiffer, the Communications Director of Obama transition team
   released the following statement (via [1]Politico):

     "At the direction of the president-elect, a review of Transition
     staff contacts with Governor Blagojevich and his office has been
     conducted and completed and is ready for release. That review
     affirmed the public statements of the president-elect that he had
     no contact with the governor or his staff, and that the
     President-elect's staff was not involved in inappropriate
     discussions with the governor or his staff over the selection of
     his successor as U.S. senator.

     "Also at the president-elect's direction, Gregory Craig, counsel to
     the Transition, has kept the U.S. Attorney's office informed of
     this fact-gathering process in order to ensure our full cooperation
     with the investigation.

     "In the course of those discussions, the U.S. Attorney's office
     requested the public release of the Transition review be deferred
     until the week of December 22, in order not to impede their
     investigation of the governor. The Transition has agreed to this
     revised timetable for release."

   As before, it's important to read this new release, both for what it
   says and what it doesn't say.

   The press release says that "the President-elect's staff was not
   involved in inappropriate discussions with the governor or his staff
   over the selection of his successor as U.S. senator."

   While this statement seems on a casual reading to be a denial of
   contact, it actually implies the opposite: that there were contacts
   but they were not "inappropriate." As I've argued before, everything
   points to the Obama camp rejecting any corrupt bargains that may have
   been offered to them.

   It would seem that there are contacts mentioned in the report;
   otherwise, there would be nothing to hold back for a week. Would it
   have killed them to admit that there were contacts between the Obama
   staff and Blagojevioch and his staff (which they couldn't yet
   disclose), but these contacts were not inappropriate? It's as if the
   Obama camp are responding to a discovery request and they just can't
   bring themselves to be fully forthcoming.

   As I [2]noted before -- and today's release underscores -- Obama has
   not promised to release any information about contacts between his
   staff and unofficial emissaries of Blagojevich, including the very
   contacts detailed in the wiretaps:

     The first contemplated contact is for the SEIU official (identified
     by the New York Times as Tom Balanoff) to contact Valerie Jarrett
     or another Obama aide. According to the Times, SEIU officials
     recently argued that �All the official did . . . was listen to Mr.
     Blagojevich and his chief of staff and ferry some messages for
     them.� If the Times is correct, then Balanoff did ferry messages
     from the Blagojevich camp to the Obama camp, essentially as
     requested.

     But this contact would not be covered by Obama�s promised
     disclosure since it was not �between the transition office and the
     governor�s office.� . . .

     Nor would the second contact be covered by Obama�s promise to
     disclose. That was between �Individual A� and a �President-elect
     Advisor,� not �between the transition office and the governor�s
     office.�

     So the affidavit alleges two times that Blagojevich asks someone to
     convey his corrupt offer to the Obama camp. Neither was directly
     �between the transition office and the governor�s office,� so
     neither would be covered by Obama�s disclosure promise.

   If weekend news stories are correct and Rahm Emanuel (quite
   appropriately) conveyed a list of candidates that Obama considered
   acceptable, then this would underscore just how narrowly Obama defines
   "contact."

   It would seem highly likely that Obama had input into the list of
   candidates (David Axelrod's statement three weeks ago implies that he
   did) and that Emanuel conveyed the list at Obama's direction. (If
   Emanuel came up with the list all by himself and conveyed it to
   Blagojevich without Obama's permission, I doubt that Obama would want
   him around as Chief of Staff, and the coverage of the campaign
   suggests that Obama is a hands-on administrator.)

   If all this is correct, then Obama's agreeing on a written list of
   Senate candidates acceptable to him and asking his chief of staff to
   convey that list orally or in writing to Blagojevich does not
   constitute "contact" in Obama's mind. If these news reports are true,
   was it really candid to say, "I had no contact with the governor or
   his office"?

   Obama's delay today is fully proper. But we will have to wait to see
   his report to tell whether Obama is going to release the contacts
   relevant to the attempted shakedown.

References

   1. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16585.html
   2. http://volokh.com/posts/1229144175.shtml

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to