Posted by Eugene Volokh:
AP Story Errs in Reporting "Actual Malice" Standard:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_12_14-2008_12_20.shtml#1229397957


   From an [1]AP story:

     The Supreme Court has rejected a plea by former Army scientist
     Steven J. Hatfill to revive his libel lawsuit against The New York
     Times over columns falsely implicating him in the deadly 2001
     anthrax attacks.

     The justices did not comment Monday in turning down Hatfill's
     appeal of a unanimous ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of
     Appeals, based in Richmond, Va. A three-judge panel affirmed a
     lower court's dismissal of the libel claims on the grounds that
     Hatfill is a public figure and failed to prove that columns written
     by Nicholas Kristof were malicious....

   No, actually the panel reasoned that Hatfill failed to prove that the
   columns were published with what libel law calls "actual malice":
   "that The Times had knowledge that the columns were false or published
   them with reckless disregard of whether they were false." "Actual
   malice" is thus a legal term of art that has little to do with what
   English speakers actually call malice (in the sense of ill will).

   So this is partly the fault of the lawyers. You'd hope that "malice"
   in law would mean what "malice" means in English, but if it doesn't,
   at least you'd hope that "actual malice" would actually mean that. No
   such luck.

   But mass-market journalists' job is to translate jargon into English,
   and to know jargon when they see it. Unfortunately that didn't happen
   here.

   More broadly, keep an eye out for this sort of slip: When you hear
   "malice" talked about in articles about libel lawsuits, it probably
   means "knowledge the statement was false, or reckless disregard of
   whether it was false." Except, unfortunately, when it doesn't, since
   sometimes "malice" even in libel lawsuits does really mean "malice" in
   the sense of "ill will." Arggh.

   Thanks to [2]Bill Poser (Language Log) for the pointer.

References

   1. 
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/15/washington/AP-Scotus-Anthrax-Hatfill.html?_r=1
   2. http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to